U.S. Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler, R-Battle Ground, has said the U.S. House of Representatives should hold a formal impeachment vote in order to grant bipartisan legitimacy to the investigation of President Donald Trump and grant House Republicans subpoena power.
In a conversation with the Columbian’s editorial board on Wednesday, the congresswoman said she disagrees with the White House’s current strategy to stonewall the House’s investigation altogether.
She said she understands the president’s unwillingness to participate in a process many perceive as partisan, however.
“I see the point, when one party is saying the other party doesn’t get to be part of the investigation. You start to wonder if this is going to be a fair investigation,” Herrera Beutler said.
Despite broad support among House Democrats to formally launch an impeachment inquiry, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has held off on holding a vote – likely to protect 31 House Democrats in vulnerable swing districts where Trump remains popular, Herrera Beutler said.
But Herrera Beutler said the vote is a necessary step. She pointed to the impeachment proceedings surrounding former President Bill Clinton, when the House granted subpoena power to Democrats and Republicans in opening a formal impeachment inquiry.
That’s crucial for public perception of legitimacy, Herrera Beutler said. It’s the difference between “partisan impeachment” and a “bipartisan investigation.”
“That has to happen here,” Herrera Beutler said. “Otherwise the president’s going to have – in the minds of the American public – he’s going to have the right to say, ‘That’s a total witch hunt.’ If they (Democrats) really believe they can prove it, then why not let us subpoena people?”
Herrera Beutler did not specify how she would vote if a bill opening a formal impeachment inquiry came to the House floor.
A “yes” vote would mark a major departure from her party; no other Republican member of Congress has said they’d support an official impeachment inquiry, according to a running list from the New York Times.
Herrera Beutler also repeated her previous assertion that she’s seen no proof of a “quid pro quo,” or that the president withheld $400 million in aid in exchange for political favors during a phone call with the president of Ukraine.
Until that can be proved, Herrera Beutler said, she wouldn’t support removing Trump from office.
“Do I think the president had an appropriate conversation? No. Do I think that was wise? No. But I don’t think that’s a high enough bar for impeachment,” Herrera Beutler said.
“It’s not about Donald Trump. It’s not about me. It’s not about who’s in charge of the House. This is about our entire institution and how our democracy functions. And unless someone’s going to be the adults and do it the right way, we’re going to make it worse.”
Subscribe to the Morning Review newsletter
Get the day’s top headlines delivered to your inbox every morning by subscribing to our newsletter.