Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper

The Spokesman-Review Newspaper The Spokesman-Review

Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883
News >  Nation/World

Trump attempted to use military aid to pressure Ukraine on political investigations, Bolton says

June 17, 2020 Updated Wed., June 17, 2020 at 3:52 p.m.

FILE - In this Sept. 30, 2019, file photo, former national security adviser John Bolton gestures while speakings at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.  (Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
FILE - In this Sept. 30, 2019, file photo, former national security adviser John Bolton gestures while speakings at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington. (Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
By Rosalind S. Helderman

WASHINGTON - For months, as the nation was convulsed by the impeachment of President Donald Trump, his critics held out hope that the congressional proceedings would unearth a high-level witness with first-person testimony about Trump’s efforts to use his office to try to pressure Ukraine to launch investigations that could bolster him politically.

Now, more than four months after Trump was acquitted by a Republican-led Senate, former Trump national security adviser John Bolton has emerged with just such an account in his new book, “The Room Where It Happened: A White House Memoir.”

In it, Bolton asserts that the delay in releasing $400 million in security assistance for Ukraine last summer was an attempt by the president to get the foreign country to provide damaging material about former secretary of state Hillary Clinton and former vice president Joe Biden.

The former national security adviser cites personal conversations in which he describes a quid pro quo that Trump long denied, including an August meeting in which Bolton alleges that Trump made the bargain explicit.

“He said he wasn’t in favor of sending them anything until all Russia-investigation material related to Clinton and Biden had been turned over,” Bolton writes.

The Washington Post obtained a copy of Bolton’s 592-page memoir, which is set to be released publicly June 23.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the contents of the book. The administration has said the memoir contains classified material, which Bolton’s attorney disputes. The Justice Department sued Bolton this week, seeking to block its distribution.

During the impeachment process, lower-level officials testified that they believed Trump had sought to condition the security dollars on Ukrainian willingness to provide politically useful information about his opponents. In a July 25 phone call, Trump asked the country’s newly elected president, Volodymyr Zelensky, to open investigations into Biden and the 2016 election.

But Trump and Zelensky did not discuss the financial assistance on the call, and the White House has denied that the president connected the two issues. Many Senate Republicans argued that House impeachment managers failed to prove the case because numerous witnesses acknowledged they had not personally heard Trump say the two were linked.

The after-the-fact account bolstering the core of the impeachment case probably will be cold comfort to Democrats who listened to Trump’s defense team and Republican lawmakers repeatedly dismiss hours of testimony, arguing that few of the witnesses who agreed to participate had spoken directly to Trump about Ukraine.

They have accused Bolton of withholding an account crucial to the public’s interest and instead saving it for a moneymaking memoir.

“Bolton’s staff were asked to testify before the House to Trump’s abuses, and did. They had a lot to lose and showed real courage,” House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., who led the impeachment inquiry, tweeted Wednesday. “When Bolton was asked, he refused, and said he’d sue if subpoenaed. Instead, he saved it for a book. Bolton may be an author, but he’s no patriot.”

Bolton is silent on whether he believes Trump’s actions toward Ukraine merited impeachment - and pointedly critical of how Democrats handled an impeachment process that he refused to assist.

But he writes that he found Trump’s actions “deeply disturbing” and potentially illegal.

Bolton portrays a president entirely captive to “conspiracy fantasies” about Ukraine spun by his personal attorney Rudy Giuliani and whose approach toward a U.S. ally, according to Bolton, was entirely motivated by his own political fortunes instead of the national interest.

“I thought the whole affair was bad policy, questionable legally and unacceptable as presidential behavior,” Bolton wrote.

Giuliani did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

In the book, Bolton defends his approach to the impeachment proceedings, claiming that Democrats oversaw a rushed, unnecessarily partisan process guided largely by the calendar of the party’s presidential primaries. He blames them for narrowing the focus of the proceedings when what he called “Ukraine-like transgressions” existed across Trump’s foreign policymaking, he said.

Out of respect for the powers of the executive branch, Bolton said he would not testify without a court requiring him to do so, given that Trump and White House lawyers had ordered him not to appear. He criticized House Democrats for not issuing him a subpoena to testify or fully seeking to enforce a subpoena issued to his deputy that he says might have provided legal guidance for top Trump aides.

As for the Senate, where Republicans chose to call no witnesses at all, he concludes that his account “would have made no significant difference” in Trump’s acquittal - blaming Democrats’ “impeachment malpractice” for poisoning the process, rather than the Republicans who never asked for his testimony.

He writes that he wanted to tell his story in his own way and was determined to bide his time to do it.

“I believed, as the line in Hamilton goes, that ‘I am not throwing away my shot,’ especially not to please the howling press, the howling advocates of impeachment or Trump’s howling defenders,” he wrote.

Still, while Bolton refused to defy the White House and testify without a court order, he nevertheless proceeded with publication of his book over Trump’s vehement opposition.

The president this week threatened that Bolton would have “criminal problems” if he released his memoir, saying it contains classified material. Bolton’s attorney has denied that.

The basics of Bolton’s account about Ukraine have been known since January, when The New York Times published key details, citing people who had reviewed the book manuscript.

But the book itself provides dramatic new details and quotes, suggesting that nearly all of Trump’s top aides knew why the president was withholding the military dollars.

Bolton wrote that Trump had always been hostile to Ukraine, perceiving it as a roadblock to his desire for better relations with Moscow and a troublesome irritant best handled by Europe instead of the United States.

He describes Trump as growing increasingly incensed by Ukraine in spring 2019, spun up by Giuliani to believe that the foreign country was working with Democrats against him.

Bolton wrote that on May 8, he was summoned to the Oval Office, where Trump was meeting with Giuliani, then-acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney and White House counsel Pat Cipollone. The group was discussing Giuliani’s desire to meet with Zelensky to discuss Ukrainian investigations into Clinton and the 2016 election, as well as Biden and his son Hunter, who sat on the board of a Ukrainian gas company.

“Even after they became public, I could barely separate the strands of the multiple conspiracy theories at work,” Bolton writes. He says Trump came to conclude, without evidence, that Ukraine rather than Russia had been behind cyberhacks of Democratic officials in 2016.

During the May meeting, Bolton wrote, Trump ordered him to call Zelensky and ask him to meet with Giuliani - an intermingling of Trump’s personal agenda with the work of government officials.

Bolton ignored the instruction, he wrote, and Giuliani ultimately canceled his planned trip to Kyiv after it was reported by The Times.

Trump and Giuliani have denied that the meeting took place, or that Trump asked Bolton to call the Ukrainian president on Giuliani’s behalf.

Bolton described Trump’s beliefs about Ukraine as widely known by senior staffers, particularly after an Oval Office meeting Trump held with Energy Secretary Rick Perry, Ukraine envoy Kurt Volker, E.U. Ambassador Gordon Sondland and Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., after the group attended Zelensky’s May 2019 inauguration.

Bolton did not attend the meeting but said his deputy, Charles Kupperman, reported that Trump railed against Ukraine, at one point telling the group, “Ukraine tried to take me down. I’m not f—-ing interested in helping them,” and “I want the f—-ing DNC server,” using an expletive to refer to a conspiracy theory about a Democratic Party server hacked by Russia that he claimed could be found in Ukraine.

By the time Trump and Zelensky spoke on July 25, a phone call that prompted a whistleblower complaint and ultimately the president’s impeachment, Bolton writes that it was clear to him that “the linkage of the military assistance to Giuliani’s fantasies was already baked in.”

Bolton wrote that on at least eight occasions, he, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Secretary of Defense Mark Esper pressed Trump to release the money, speaking to him either individually or together.

The Pentagon, asked about Bolton’s characterization on Wednesday afternoon, declined to comment. The State Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Trump made the reasons for his opposition explicit during an Aug. 20 meeting with Bolton, according to the book, when the president said he would not release the aid to Ukraine until he got information about his political enemies.

Bolton writes that he suspected some of Giuliani’s activities, including his effort to oust the well-respected U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, Marie Yovanovitch, might have been driven by the interests of Giuliani’s other clients, who were, unlike Trump, paying the former New York mayor.

At one point, Bolton describes meeting with Mulvaney, Cipollone and other White House lawyers, to discuss whether Giuliani had “ethical problems,” given attorney rules that bar using one client relationship to advance the interests of other clients.

Bolton writes that the others determined that Giuliani’s actions were “slimy” but not likely a violation of the rules.

“So much for legal ethics,” he wrote.

Bolton also alerted Pompeo and Attorney General William Barr to his concerns, saying he called Barr on Aug. 1, a week after Trump told Zelensky by phone that he should work with Barr and Giuliani on investigations of Biden.

Bolton wrote that he briefed Barr on the conversation, including Trump’s references to the attorney general. “I suggested he have someone rein Giuliani in before he got completely out of control,” Bolton wrote.

Barr has denied learning of the call from Bolton, saying he learned of it in mid-August.

Bolton wrote that Pompeo too was concerned about Giuliani’s actions in Ukraine, telling Bolton at one point that there were “no facts to support” Giuliani’s allegations that Yovanovitch was working against Trump’s interests. Still, pressed by Trump, Pompeo abruptly ordered Yovanovitch, a 30-year career diplomat, to leave her post in April.

Bolton insists that his own behind-the-scenes efforts to get Ukraine its financial assistance while working to curb Giuliani’s influence was the most effective way to address Trump’s improper behavior, rather than confronting the president more directly or resigning in protest over the episode.

In his book, Bolton also confirms two of the most memorable revelations of the impeachment proceedings.

He did tell adviser Fiona Hill that he did not want to be part of any “drug deal” being cooked up by Mulvaney and Sondland regarding Ukraine, he wrote.

And he said he warned colleagues that Giuliani was a “hand grenade” likely to blow up the White House, adding that the remark “still sounds right today.”

The Washington Post’s Josh Dawsey, John Hudson and Dan Lamothe contributed to this report.

The Spokesman-Review Newspaper

Local journalism is essential.

Give directly to The Spokesman-Review's Northwest Passages community forums series -- which helps to offset the costs of several reporter and editor positions at the newspaper -- by using the easy options below. Gifts processed in this system are not tax deductible, but are predominately used to help meet the local financial requirements needed to receive national matching-grant funds.

Active Person

Subscribe now to get breaking news alerts in your email inbox

Get breaking news delivered to your inbox as it happens.