Arrow-right Camera
Subscribe now

Public health, not politics

To some people,the assertions and arguments from the vocal minority opposed to having the optimal level of fluoride in our water might seem reasonable. They say that there is such and such a study or statement that “proves” their points, but on closer inspection those studies and statistics have been found to be greatly flawed or biased by design. It is interesting that their studies have not been replicated, meaning that they don’t stand up to the standards of the scientific community!

Rather argue about studies, perhaps using a little common sense should settle things. Community water fluoridation has been around for nearly 75 years and if there was any real concern about safety, why would three-quarters of Americans continue to drink water with the optimum level of fluoride?

This is a proven public health measure, not a political one. We would never ask to vote on whether to add chlorine to our water to make it healthier. We need to trust our City Council members to make a decision based on science and research, not hearsay and conspiracy theories.

Jim Sledge

Spokane



Letters policy

The Spokesman-Review invites original letters on local topics of public interest. Your letter must adhere to the following rules:

  • No more than 250 words
  • We reserve the right to reject letters that are not factually correct, racist or are written with malice.
  • We cannot accept more than one letter a month from the same writer.
  • With each letter, include your daytime phone number and street address.
  • The Spokesman-Review retains the nonexclusive right to archive and re-publish any material submitted for publication.

Unfortunately, we don’t have space to publish all letters received, nor are we able to acknowledge their receipt. (Learn more.)

Submit letters using any of the following:

Our online form
Submit your letter here
Mail
Letters to the Editor
The Spokesman-Review
999 W. Riverside Ave.
Spokane, WA 99201
Fax
(509) 459-3815

Read more about how we crafted our Letters to the Editor policy