Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper
Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883

Many Fireflies Prefer to Dance in the Dark

By Veronique Greenwood New York Times

As dusk deepens the shadow at the forest’s edge, a tiny beacon lights up the gloom. Soon, the twilight is full of drifting lights, each winking a message in peculiar semaphore: “Male seeks female for brief union.” This courtship plays out on summer nights the world over among beetles of the Lampyridae family, commonly known as fireflies.

The darkness in which fireflies have always pursued their liaisons, however, has been breached by the glare of artificial lights. Humans’ love affair with illumination has led to light pollution at night for much of Earth’s habitable surfaces. In recent years, scientists who study fireflies have heard from people who are worried that the insects may be in decline, said Avalon Owens, an entomologist at Tufts University.

“There’s this sense of doom,” she said. “They seem to not be in places where they used to be.”

So little is known about how fireflies live that it is hard to assess whether they are in danger — and if so, why, Owens said.

But in a study published last week in the journal Royal Society Open Science, she and Sara Lewis, a professor of biology at Tufts University, investigated how fireflies respond to artificial illumination.

Experiments in forests and fields as well as the lab showed that while some North American fireflies would mate with wild abandon, regardless of illumination, others did not complete a single successful mating under the glare.

Fireflies seem to rely primarily on flashes of light to find each other, which means light pollution could threaten their ability to see mates. In the four common species the study examines, the females hide on the ground and observe as males wander the skies. When a female responds to a male’s flashing with her own, the two enter into a dialogue that can end in a meeting, and eventually mating. In previous work, Owens and Lewis found that shining light on female fireflies of the species Photinus obscurellus made them less likely to respond to the males’ calls.

In a forest west of Boston, the scientists played the role of female fireflies and responded to Photinus greeni males with green LED lights. The lights were either in darkness or illuminated, as if by a street lamp. The scientists found that more than 96% of the males preferred darkness. Then, in lab experiments with P. obscurellus, they observed that while dim light did little to hamper successful mating, in brighter light, none of the firefly couples mated. The insects found each other, and some even crawled over each other, but something kept them from going any further.

“This is really important because we have all been wasting our time running around counting flashes, and none of it matters if they are literally next to each other and don’t mate,” Owens recalls thinking. “It’s pretty concerning.”

She speculates that the fireflies are interpreting the light as daytime and are waiting to mate in dimmer conditions — essentially waiting for a night that never comes.

It was in a field in Tionesta, Pennsylvania, that Owens saw something that complicated the doom-and-gloom of the lab experiments. Bruce Parkhurst, a firefly enthusiast who lives in the area, alerted her to the introduction of bright outdoor lights to a visitors center, so Owens and her colleagues studied local fireflies’ behavior in the adjoining field.

Over the course of many July nights, they captured and marked females of two species — P. pyralis and P. marginellus and placed them in areas of the field on a spectrum from brightly lit to fully dark. Females in bright areas had a tendency to show up later and farther into the shadows, suggesting that if the insects found the light uncomfortable, they would simply move to darkness. But even where the light was almost blinding to the researchers, fireflies of both species somehow found each other and mated successfully.

“They are just mating left, right and center,” Owens said. “They do not care at all. To be there in the field and see it is crazy.”

In a group as large and diverse as fireflies — more than 2,000 species worldwide — adaptation to different levels of darkness may mean different responses to light pollution, the researchers surmise. Of the four species in the study, P. obscurellus, the insect that never mated in bright light, is also the least active at dusk, preferring deep night. What doesn’t bother one group, then, could destroy another.

Could there be a version of artificial lighting that’s friendly to all fireflies — a wavelength of light that works for humans and for light-sensitive insects? Owens has pursued the idea for some time, but a universally harmless option has remained elusive.

The best solution may be something simpler and more radical: greater consciousness of outdoor lights and using them more sparingly. While the study suggests that fireflies might be able to flee light pollution for havens of darkness, if there is no dark place left for them, the nightly symphony of tiny lights may become a thing of the past.