Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper

The Spokesman-Review Newspaper The Spokesman-Review

Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883
Partly Cloudy Night 70° Partly Cloudy
News >  Business

Former Toys ‘R’ us executives face trial over botched bankruptcy

June 28, 2022 Updated Tue., June 28, 2022 at 7:21 p.m.

Signage is displayed outside a Toys R Us Inc. retail store in Louisville, Ky., on Sept. 18, 2017.  (Bloomberg )
Signage is displayed outside a Toys R Us Inc. retail store in Louisville, Ky., on Sept. 18, 2017. (Bloomberg )
By Jeremy Hill and Eliza Ronalds-Hannon Bloomberg

Former Toys “R” Us executives are set to stand trial over allegations they misled suppliers about the retailer’s dire financial condition while the company tried to stay afloat in bankruptcy and then stiffed them on more than $600 million worth of bills.

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Keith Phillips on Monday said a trial should go forward, rebuffing a request from the former executives to throw out the creditor claims entirely.

The former directors and officers have denied wrongdoing.

Open questions, according to the judge, include whether the retailer was already insolvent when it paid nearly $18 million to its private-equity backers – Bain Capital, KKR & Co. and Vornado Realty Trust – between 2014 and 2017.

The creditors also allege that millions of dollars of bonuses paid to 117 Toys “R” Us executives and managers just prior to the company’s 2017 bankruptcy amount to a breach of the former executives’ fiduciary duty.

The largest bonus – $2.8 million – went to former Chief Executive Officer David Brandon.

An official committee of low-ranking creditors later negotiated a reduction in the bonus amounts, according to court papers.

The collapse of Toys “R” Us involved a little-anticipated bankruptcy filing in 2017 that set off a months-long effort to restructure the company in bankruptcy court before it ultimately liquidated early the next year.

The company had struggled for a decade with a crushing debt load from its 2005 leveraged buyout by Bain, KKR and Vornado.

The directors revealed in pretrial depositions that they knew the company couldn’t comply with the terms of debt taken on to finance the bankruptcy, according to filings by the unpaid creditor group.

Financial forecasts the directors describe reviewing in August 2017, before the bankruptcy began, showed the company would breach a liquidity covenant by January 2018.

The company’s breach of that covenant marked the beginning of a pivot to abandon the restructuring effort and wind operations down.

The creditors also argued that the executives’ decision to take on more debt to fund the bankruptcy was negligent, but Judge Phillips on Tuesday nixed that and related claims, deferring to the court’s blessing of so-called debtor-in-possession financing during the bankruptcy.

Attorneys representing the former company executives didn’t immediately respond to an email seeking comment Tuesday morning.

The case is TRU Creditor Litigation Trust v. Raether et al, 20-03038, U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Richmond).

The Spokesman-Review Newspaper

Local journalism is essential.

Give directly to The Spokesman-Review's Northwest Passages community forums series -- which helps to offset the costs of several reporter and editor positions at the newspaper -- by using the easy options below. Gifts processed in this system are not tax deductible, but are predominately used to help meet the local financial requirements needed to receive national matching-grant funds.

Active Person

Subscribe now to get breaking news alerts in your email inbox

Get breaking news delivered to your inbox as it happens.