Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper

The Spokesman-Review Newspaper The Spokesman-Review

Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883
Partly Cloudy Day 81° Partly Cloudy
Sports >  Outdoors

Refunds for deer tags questioned by former IFG commissioner

Brad Brooks adjusts his earplugs while hunting ducks near Bruneau, Idaho, on Jan. 15, 2019.  (Nicole Blanchard)
Brad Brooks adjusts his earplugs while hunting ducks near Bruneau, Idaho, on Jan. 15, 2019. (Nicole Blanchard)
By Eric Barker The Lewiston Tribune

LEWISTON – A former Idaho Fish and Game commissioner is questioning why some nonresident hunters were offered refunds last fall following an outbreak of a disease that killed thousands of white-tail deer.

The Idaho Department of Fish and Game reached out to hunters in Unit 11A and offered to refund unused tags. The move, first prompted by requests from outfitters in the unit, was made because mortality rates for white-tail deer were exceptionally high in the game management unit, said Fish and Game spokesman Roger Phillips at Boise. Unlike resident hunters, those from out of state don’t have the option to move to other units when instances like disease or wildfire significantly affect hunting success. The department ultimately gave refunds to 99 out-of-state hunters.

“We knew this area was hit hard by (epizootic hemorrhagic disease), and because those nonresidents were restricted only to that unit and could not go elsewhere, we gave them the option to get a refund if they turned in their unused tag,” Phillips said.

He said the move was discussed during an open commission meeting at Lewiston in November and authorized by Fish and Game Director Ed Schriever. The offers were sent, via email, to nonresident tag holders in late November, while the season was still open.

But Dan Blanco, a former commissioner from Moscow, said the agency should have been more transparent about the offer and the extent of deer mortality in the area.

“That is awfully late in the game to be offering a refund on a tag. Why was that offer made to nonresidents when no offer was made to residents and why was this not made public? It’s an extraordinary move. I can’t think of an instance when refunds were made on an unsolicited basis to nonresident hunters.”

Blanco believes resident hunters should have been made aware of the refund offer and the extent of deer mortality in the unit so they could make more informed comments to the agency in March prior to the setting of fall deer hunting seasons. The commission eliminated 1,500 extra antlerless tags in the Clearwater Region, including 300 in Unit 11A, for the fall 2022 season in response to the EHD outbreak.

Phillips said the department didn’t issue a news release because it reached the nonresident hunters via email and the refund had been discussed in November.

“We reached out to the holders of those tags to give them that information, and we also discussed it in an open session of a commission meeting,” he said. “There was nothing happening behind the scenes.”

The Spokesman-Review Newspaper

Local journalism is essential.

Give directly to The Spokesman-Review's Northwest Passages community forums series -- which helps to offset the costs of several reporter and editor positions at the newspaper -- by using the easy options below. Gifts processed in this system are not tax deductible, but are predominately used to help meet the local financial requirements needed to receive national matching-grant funds.

Active Person

Subscribe to the sports newsletter

Get the day’s top sports headlines and breaking news delivered to your inbox by subscribing here.