Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper

The Spokesman-Review Newspaper The Spokesman-Review

Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883
Cloudy 24° Cloudy
News >  Nation/World

Supreme Court says House Jan. 6 committee may obtain Kelli Ward’s phone records

Nov. 14, 2022 Updated Mon., Nov. 14, 2022 at 12:02 p.m.

Kelli Ward in a 2018 file photo. The House select committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol urged the Supreme Court in October not to delay a subpoena for phone records of Ward, and on Monday, the court let the subpoena stand.   (Ralph Freso/Getty Images North America/TNS)
Kelli Ward in a 2018 file photo. The House select committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol urged the Supreme Court in October not to delay a subpoena for phone records of Ward, and on Monday, the court let the subpoena stand.  (Ralph Freso/Getty Images North America/TNS)
By David G. Savage Los Angeles Times

WASHINGTON — Turning away a plea from Arizona GOP chair Kelli Ward to keep her phone records private, the Supreme Court on Monday let stand a subpoena from the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.

The decision came in a one-line order, with dissents by Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito Jr.

Ward was not at the Capitol when a mob tried to stop the certification of President Joe Biden’s victory, but the House committee alleged she “played a significant role in attempting to overturn the 2020 election.”

The committee said she refused to accept President Donald Trump’s loss in Arizona, and instead created a slate of “fake” state electors for Trump, which was transmitted to Washington. Trump allies hoped to stall Congress from certifying Biden’s victory by arguing the outcome was in doubt because there were now competing slates of electors.

In March, Ward invoked her Fifth Amendment right to remain silent. In response, the committee sought records from her mobile phone provider detailing incoming and outgoing calls between November 2020 and early January 2021.

Ward went to court to block the subpoena, arguing it violated her free speech rights.

She lost before a federal judge and the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. The judge ruled that the targets of a lawful investigation do not have a First Amendment right to refuse to participate.

Then Ward lodged an emergency appeal with the Supreme Court.

Her lawyers characterized the investigation as a political attack.

“In a first-of-its-kind situation, a select committee of the United States Congress, dominated by one political party, has subpoenaed the personal telephone and text message records of a state chair of the rival political party relating to one of the most contentious political events in American history — the 2020 election and the Capitol riot of January 6, 2021,” they said.

As precedent, they cited a decision last year in which the high court blocked California from obtaining the names of big donors who sponsored tax-exempt charities. The 6-3 conservative majority ruled that the forced disclosure of private information violated the donor’s rights to the freedom of association.

In that decision, however, the court said the state could issue a subpoena to obtain the names of donors if a fraud was suspected.

The Spokesman-Review Newspaper

Local journalism is essential.

Give directly to The Spokesman-Review's Northwest Passages community forums series -- which helps to offset the costs of several reporter and editor positions at the newspaper -- by using the easy options below. Gifts processed in this system are not tax deductible, but are predominately used to help meet the local financial requirements needed to receive national matching-grant funds.

Active Person

Subscribe now to get breaking news alerts in your email inbox

Get breaking news delivered to your inbox as it happens.