This column reflects the opinion of the writer. Learn about the differences between a news story and an opinion column.

Doug Clark: Race for sheriff is debate-intensive

DOUG’S SHERIFF’S DEBATE DIARY:

Wednesday, 4:57 p.m. – We’re an hour and counting away from OZ vs. ORR I, the first debate* between Spokane County Sheriff Ozzie Knezovich and his opponent, Douglas Orr, a Spokane detective with a Ph.D. in criminal justice.

(*This debate is brought to you by the 6th District Democrats and the letter “P” as in “prevarication,” I mean, “politics.”)

4:58 – That Ph.D. poses a lot of questions. Like, if we elect this guy will we have to call him Dr. Sheriff?

I don’t know if I’m comfortable with having a public official so much smarter than me. Or is it I?

4:59 – The Spokane City Council Chambers is practically empty except for me, some guy who might be sleeping in a back row plus Oz, who looks like he’d rather be anywhere else.

4:59:30 – “I don’t like politics,” mutters the sheriff, who doesn’t have a Ph.D.

5:00 – I turn off my computer and …

5:58 – Oz and Orr meet with a referee to go over the last-minute rules of engagement: No rabbit punches. No clinching. And no hitting below the belt unless you’re certain you can get away with it.

The usual debate stuff, in other words.

6:04 – Mary Wissink, the emcee, says Oz won the coin flip and gets to speak first. She fails to mention, however, whether he gave back the coin.

6:05 – In their opening statements we learn that the sheriff is a man of vision and that the challenger is firm yet fair.

Good grief. I came for a slugfest, not a hugfest.

6:09 – Mary the emcee announces that a decision was made earlier to NOT discuss any personnel issues.

This is an outrage. The public has a right to know a lot more about that deputy who got fired for having sex on duty.

6:10 – If elected, Orr says he will put the review process on a webcam for everyone to see.

Now we’re talking!

6:17 – The debate slogs into confusion over the rules of rebuttal. There was a time not so long ago when real sheriff candidates settled issues like this out in streets.

6:18 – Orr makes a great point by saying that statistics are “like a bikini.” Sadly, I lose track of everything that came after the word bikini.

6:27 – Fact: Some 46 deputies are eligible to retire in the next few years. On the plus side, this does significantly diminish your odds of getting a ticket.

6:33 – “You have to have thick skin” to be sheriff, says Oz. I believe him. In his size-54 suit, Ozzie Knezovich looks about as soft as a cement mixer.

6:34 – Not to be cruel. But next to the bearlike sheriff, Orr looks more like a librarian.

6:35 – Mary the emcee tells Oz he’s “out of order.” Hmm. Sheriff Wissink has a ring to it.

6:36 – Talk turns to the proper use of drones.

6:38 – Oz draws applause by playing “the U.S. Constitution” card.

6:42 – “Do you believe in gun control?” asks Wissink.

Actually, I’d rather hear the candidates talk more about debate control.

6:45 – Sheriff Oz seems to be winning this shindig on time management. I swear he’s yakking three times more than poor Orr.

If the Seahawks control the ball this much against the 49ers, they’re going to the Super Bowl.

6:51 – Oz says he’s still putting up with a DOS computer system. He’d get rid of it, but the Pong game is so groovy.

6:54 – The sheriff says he parts company with Orr when it comes to truth, facts and integrity.

Boom goes the dynamite!

6:58 – We do not need a $200 million jail, says Orr. We certainly don’t as long as we have the Ridpath Hotel.

7:05 – I think I …

7:17 – … dozed off or …

7:28 – … something.

7:30 – The debate finally ends and on a potentially troubling note. Some of the people sitting next to me swear they heard Orr challenge Oz to 30 more of these things.

“Thirty? As in 3-0?” I ask.

They nod their heads.

Well, if such a thing actually happens, then society will have finally answered that old question.

You know, the one about what constitutes cruel and unusual punishment.

Thank you for visiting Spokesman.com. To continue reading this story and enjoying our local journalism please subscribe or log in.

You have reached your article limit for this month.

Subscribe now and enjoy unlimited digital access to Spokesman.com

Unlimited Digital Access

Stay connected to Spokane for as little as 99¢!

Subscribe for access

Already a Spokesman-Review subscriber? Activate or Log in

You have reached your article limit for this month.

Subscribe now and enjoy unlimited digital access to Spokesman.com

Unlimited Digital Access

Stay connected to Spokane for as little as 99¢!

Subscribe for access

Already a Spokesman-Review subscriber? Activate or Log in

Oops, it appears there has been a technical problem. To access this content as intended, please try reloading the page or returning at a later time. Already a Spokesman-Review subscriber? Activate or Log in