With amusing yet frustratingly poor logic, Becky McPherson argues in her March 8 letter that conscientious objectors are no different from wedding cake decorators who choose to refuse service to lesbians and gays. They are both motivated by morals and religion, she contends. Yet the difference is obvious: Conscientious objectors are not providing a service to the public, and they are not denying equal access to anyone.

McPherson objects to “forcing” individuals to produce a product that celebrates a union they oppose. She should understand that no one is forcing anyone to make anything; only to provide a service to the public without unlawful discrimination. Otherwise, they should get out of the service business.

McPherson may want to pick and choose the objects of discrimination, but she does not get that opportunity. The law stipulates which groups are protected against discrimination, and the courts have increasingly held that civil rights are not subject to popular vote.

John Mason

Spokane Valley