Intent objectionable

Jim Barbieri’s Dec. 28 rant about President Obama was published, and his use of “biracial” has been questioned in following letters. Some found it offensive. Others claimed it was just stating a fact.

We are missing the point. It is not inherently an offensive word, but it seems Barbieri used it as if it were an insult.

What does the ethnicity of a president matter? Would he also have written “Irish Ronald Reagan” or “German Dwight D. Eisenhower”? No.

His choice to use it, especially considering his negative assessment of Obama’s policies and performance, shows his intent. That is what I find objectionable.

Rose Rhoades

Spokane

Thank you for visiting Spokesman.com. To continue reading this story and enjoying our local journalism please subscribe or log in.

You have reached your article limit for this month.

Subscribe now and enjoy unlimited digital access to Spokesman.com

Unlimited Digital Access

Stay connected to Spokane for as little as 99¢!

Subscribe for access

Already a Spokesman-Review subscriber? Activate or Log in

You have reached your article limit for this month.

Subscribe now and enjoy unlimited digital access to Spokesman.com

Unlimited Digital Access

Stay connected to Spokane for as little as 99¢!

Subscribe for access

Already a Spokesman-Review subscriber? Activate or Log in

Oops, it appears there has been a technical problem. To access this content as intended, please try reloading the page or returning at a later time. Already a Spokesman-Review subscriber? Activate or Log in