Generalizing liberals

“Ethical liberals? (Craig Detmer, Jan. 27) opens with “These are the only liberals we should respect,” and closes with “Someone, please give us a list of ethical liberals.” The unmistakable message: (all) liberals are unethical and undeserving of respect.

The snide examples in the body of the letter bristle with absurd and/or false implications. In the context, saying that “rich liberals who live in poor neighborhoods,” deserve respect implies the inverse: rich liberals who don’t live in poor neighborhoods don’t deserve respect. Sending one’s children to private schools while advocating better funding for public schools is unethical; favoring the use of drones and electronic surveillance at the southern border but living in a home with door locks is unethical; etc. Think about those examples. Where’s the logic? Rich liberals never use clean energy to power their homes and offices; rich liberals oppose all guns. Demonstrably false.

Beyond the particulars, this letter is troubling because it treats about half of all Americans as refuse. No differentiation - they’re all simply contemptible. Remind you of anything? Rwanda? Serbia? World War II?

I like to think that the letter writer has had second thoughts. We all make mistakes - even the non-liberals among us.

Brian Keeling

Spokane

Thank you for visiting Spokesman.com. To continue reading this story and enjoying our local journalism please subscribe or log in.

You have reached your article limit for this month.

Subscribe now and enjoy unlimited digital access to Spokesman.com

Unlimited Digital Access

Stay connected to Spokane for as little as 99¢!

Subscribe for access

Already a Spokesman-Review subscriber? Activate or Log in

You have reached your article limit for this month.

Subscribe now and enjoy unlimited digital access to Spokesman.com

Unlimited Digital Access

Stay connected to Spokane for as little as 99¢!

Subscribe for access

Already a Spokesman-Review subscriber? Activate or Log in

Oops, it appears there has been a technical problem. To access this content as intended, please try reloading the page or returning at a later time. Already a Spokesman-Review subscriber? Activate or Log in