Chemical Weapons Tested At Two State Sites

Associated Press

Rep. Norm Dicks, D-Wash., asked the U.S. Army on Tuesday to expand an ongoing study to see whether Cold War-era biological warfare tests could have threatened the health of people in Washington state.

Army records show two of the sites subjected to the chemical weapons testing in the 1960s were located near Colfax, Wash., and Eatonville, Wash., Dicks’ spokesman George Behan said Tuesday.

“Both are fairly remote areas, so the health effects issue is expected to be limited,” Behan said.

“But we want to assure that Washington state is included in the health effects study that involves other areas of the country.”

During the 1960s, the Army used chemi cals with the same properties as some of the chemical weapons to see how they would react when sprayed from air or ground.

“The chemicals used were classified as inert and not apparently harmful. However, the full extent of the spraying of the chemicals is not known,” Behan said.

One of the sites in Washington state was at the University of Washington experimental forest known as the “PAC Forest” near Eatonville, he said.

“Evidently there was an attempt to see how chemical weapons could be used in forested areas,” Behan said.

Thank you for visiting Spokesman.com. To continue reading this story and enjoying our local journalism please subscribe or log in.

You have reached your article limit for this month.

Subscribe now and enjoy unlimited digital access to Spokesman.com

Unlimited Digital Access

Stay connected to Spokane for as little as 99¢!

Subscribe for access

Already a Spokesman-Review subscriber? Activate or Log in

You have reached your article limit for this month.

Subscribe now and enjoy unlimited digital access to Spokesman.com

Unlimited Digital Access

Stay connected to Spokane for as little as 99¢!

Subscribe for access

Already a Spokesman-Review subscriber? Activate or Log in

Oops, it appears there has been a technical problem. To access this content as intended, please try reloading the page or returning at a later time. Already a Spokesman-Review subscriber? Activate or Log in