Fairchild versus McConnell cost-benefit comparison
Although the Air Force studied four bases as possible first homes for the KC-46A, Fairchild and McConnell Air Force bases would have the lowest costs, see the smallest number of personnel changes and need the least amount of construction. Here are some differences listed in the draft environmental impact statement for bringing the first wing of new tankers to Fairchild and McConnell.
Fairchild | McConnell | |
Change in military personnel | +438 | -77 |
Change in personnel and dependents | +1,095 | -291 |
Effect on local school systems | +407 students | -108 students |
Traffic effects for daily vehicle trips | 7.5 percent increase | 2 percent decrease |
Building space needing renovation | 2 million sq. ft. | 178,640 sq. ft. |
Building space to be demolished | 188,309 sq. ft. | 144,461 sq. ft. |
New construction needed | 1.6 million sq. ft. | 418,496 sq. ft. |
Estimated construction costs | $292 million | $260 million |
Estimated construction jobs | 3,022 | 3,404 |
Number of flights per year as KC-135 base | 30,507 | 38,618 |
Number of flights per year as KC-46A base | 49,303 | 47,807 |
Thank you for visiting Spokesman.com. To continue reading this story and enjoying our local journalism please subscribe or log in.
You have reached your article limit for this month.
Subscribe now and enjoy unlimited digital access to Spokesman.com
Unlimited Digital Access
Stay connected to Spokane for as little as 99¢!
Subscribe for access
You have reached your article limit for this month.
Subscribe now and enjoy unlimited digital access to Spokesman.com
Unlimited Digital Access
Stay connected to Spokane for as little as 99¢!
Subscribe for access
Oops, it appears there has been a technical problem. To access this content as intended, please try reloading the page or returning at a later time. Already a Spokesman-Review subscriber? Activate or Log in