Elton vs. Eugster
Last night's City Council debate sponsored by the Campaign for Liberty, went free of personal attacks until David Elton landed one on Steve Eugster.
Elton, who is competing against Eugster and four other candidates for the right to represent south Spokane, complained about a blog post on Eugster's Spokane Record that questioned if Elton has an Oedipus Complex.
"That's not the way a distinguished former councilman should behave," Elton said in his closing statement. "Maybe that's why he's no longer allowed to practice law."
Elton was referring to Eugster's 18-month suspension from praciticing law handed down by the state Supreme Court in June.
Eugster's closing statement was before Elton's, so Euster didn't get a chance to mention Elton's legal problems: Felony harassment charges that prevent Elton from attending City Council meetings.
After the debate, Eugster said he didn't have anything to add, except to say that he pulled the Oedipus Complex reference from his site after learning that Elton was offended. Today, however, Eugster has reposted the original entry along with e-mails Elton sent that warned him that "Now…the gloves come off" and questioning if Eugster is a "Cowles sycophant."
Here is Eugster's original post:
One of the candidates for Spokane City Council Position 2, District 2 uses his candidacy to lambast Betsy Cowles and the Spokesman Review, wants to go after the police department because there have been “seven killings” and because a man was killed by a police officer because he had a bottle of pop in his hand (I think that’s what I heard him say), wants to tear down a short commercial building to make a 0.8 acre “open space, and wants to see a new skyscraper built downtown, (or was it Browne’s Addition?). He would use the power of government to denigrate a women, bring powerful police officers to justice, knock down an old not very tall building and build a new tall building.
What is all of this about? Is it possible the candidate has an Oedipus Complex? I suspect some hidden truth is unconsciously at work in the candidacy of David Elton. Or said another way, there is meaning here someplace.