OpenCDA Sees Threat In Letter

In case you were wondering what nonsense had the OpenCDA.com crowd’s shorts in a knot this week, Bill McCrory provides the answers . Seems they’re all huffing about David Larsen’s letter in the Coeur d’Alene Press . The money lines that has the conspiracy theorists gnashing their teeth are these from Larsen (pictured): ” … I fear your continued efforts at overturning the election may result in making it more difficult for you to find meaningful employment in the future. You might be perceived as being a disgruntled individual thereby making future employers more cautious about hiring you.” McCrory sees the comment as a “conditional indirect threat” (whatever that is). In other words, he seems to think that Larsen meant to intimidate Brannon and other office seekers. Conversely, I read it as practical advice. Brannon lost by 5 votes. He refused to seek a recount, as almost any other candidate would, and sued instead to overturn the entire election. Some folks might view him as troublesome. Not the OpenCDA crowd, of course. But some.

Question: Do you see a “conditional indirect threat” in Larsen’s letter?