Subscribe now

MLK reminder necessary

The Spokesman-Review

I disagree with Mr. Manuel’s 50-year conclusion about Dr. King’s “manipulation” of civil rights (Letters, Jan. 16).

The assassinations of John and Robert Kennedy, and of Dr. King himself, deprived us of the sort of compassionate leadership which I think would have pursued a more fair and more effective solution than the quotas to which Mr. Manuel refers.

Dr. King was not an attorney, not a legislator and not a judge. We should not blame him for current ills. He surely would disapprove of some of the distortions of equal opportunity to which people of many races have been victims. He sought fairness and opportunity, not retribution.

That moral message is as needful now as it was in 1964, and I still like it. I’m glad for the annual reminder, in the form of a national holiday.

John Hancock

Spokane

Letters policy

The Spokesman-Review invites original letters on local topics of public interest. Your letter must adhere to the following rules:

  • No more than 250 words
  • We reserve the right to reject letters that are not factually correct, racist or are written with malice.
  • We cannot accept more than one letter a month from the same writer.
  • With each letter, include your daytime phone number and street address.
  • The Spokesman-Review retains the nonexclusive right to archive and re-publish any material submitted for publication.

Unfortunately, we don’t have space to publish all letters received, nor are we able to acknowledge their receipt. (Learn more.)

Submit letters using any of the following:

Our online form
Submit your letter here
Mail
Letters to the Editor
The Spokesman-Review
999 W. Riverside Ave.
Spokane, WA 99201
Email
editor@spokesman.com
Fax
(509) 459-3815
Phone
(509) 459-5430

Read more about how we crafted our Letters to the Editor policy