Mary Castigates Attorney Cafferty
At OpenCHRG.com, Mary takes Civil Deputy Prosecutor John Cafferty to task for suggesting
that the 48 different kinds of documentation requested by attorney Starr Kelso in Jim Brannon’s lawsuit represents a “witch hunt.” She called Cafferty’s comments in his response to Kelso’s request “unprofessional.” And then lectures in her latest newsletter that the challenge is a “legitimate legal action” on behalf of the “voters of Coeur d’Alene and all Kootenai County.” Mary concludes by castigating “this attorney” (John Cafferty) for “, is flinging inflammatory, juvenile names and accusations.” You can read Mary’s comments for yourself at OpenCHRG.coom
here
.
Question: Do you see anything wrong with Deputy Civil Attorney John Cafferty offering his opinion that the demand for extensive documentation by attorney Starr Kelso, on behalf of losing candidate Jim Brannon, is a “witch hunt”?
* This story was originally published as a post from the blog "Huckleberries Online." Read all stories from this blog