Arrow-right Camera

Color Scheme

Subscribe now

This column reflects the opinion of the writer. Learn about the differences between a news story and an opinion column.

Charen’s cynicism classic

The Spokesman-Review

As an optimistic liberal, I often see conservatives as negative, can’t-do, glass-half-empty people. Mona Charen’s May 11 column didn’t disappoint.

Bobby Kennedy showed his bright outlook when he paraphrased George Bernard Shaw, “Some men see things as they are and ask why; I dream things that never were and ask why not.”

That is the kind of hopefulness that would drive a leader to try to achieve nuclear non-proliferation. To Charen, that’s childlike and naive.

Interestingly, Charen sets up a “thought experiment” based on the premise “that all existing nuclear powers agreed that their weapons were a threat to peace and security … and voluntarily destroyed them all.” She then does what so many conservative commentators do, she tears down her assumption as a reason why it won’t work – classic conservative cynicism.

Call me naive, but I think Mona would rather knock down straw men than real ones.

Bob Wynhausen

Sandpoint

Letters Policy

The Spokesman-Review invites original letters on local topics of public interest. Your letter must adhere to the following rules:

  • No more than 250 words
  • We reserve the right to reject letters that are not factually correct, racist or are written with malice.
  • We cannot accept more than one letter a month from the same writer.
  • With each letter, include your daytime phone number and street address.
  • The Spokesman-Review retains the nonexclusive right to archive and re-publish any material submitted for publication.

Unfortunately, we don’t have space to publish all letters received, nor are we able to acknowledge their receipt. (Learn more.)

Submit letters using any of the following:

Our online form
Submit your letter here
Mail
Letters to the Editor
The Spokesman-Review
999 W. Riverside Ave.
Spokane, WA 99201
Fax
(509) 459-5098

Read more about how we crafted our Letters to the Editor policy