What remains in the budget

After reading the detailed list of budget cuts to avoid a government shutdown by the House Appropriations Committee it looks like agriculture and food programs got hit extremely hard. In fact, the USDA budget will be cut by $2.6 billion , down from the $108 billion the department had been expected to spend this year. Again, one of the largest cuts it to nutrition and food programs — particularly WIC, the food voucher program for low-income women and children, is extremely saddening. With food prices rising, more will go hungry because of political posturing and compromising. There are no winners.

On the bright side, the budget is going forward that will retain the EPA’s ability to regulate greenhouse gases. For now, at least. “We will keep coming at it … There are lots of different ways to skin a cat,” said Republican senator John Thune in regards to the EPA . Me-ow.

There are more environmental protections that took hits. Grist has a list of what remains :

Interior blocked from enacting a “wildlands policy”: This policy would have allowed the Bureau of Land Management to designate areas as protected “wildlands.” “Wildlands” are more flexible for energy exploration than “wilderness,” but Republicans apparently view any attempt at preserving nature as a slap in the face to their oil exec buddies. Now any “wildlands” designation will have to be approved by Congress, and you know how much they love nature.

Salary cut for “climate change czar”: Silly Republicans, czars are imperialists! They don’t get a salary. Oh, you mean those presidential advisors, office directors, special envoys and so forth, to whom you choose to apply a meaningless yet faintly pejorative blanket term just because you don’t care for the president? Well, joke’s on you, because the “climate change czar” already resigned.

Prohibits funds for a NOAA climate change service: The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association proposed a service that would allow them “to provide a reliable and authoritative source for climate data, information, and decision support services.” Well THAT doesn’t sound very important! Maybe a clearinghouse for authoritative data was too much of a threat to the whole “nobody knows about climate change because scientists can’t agree” canard.

Transportation cuts: Cuts to “wasteful” transportation (who needs to get places, amirite?) could have been worse, but they were still pretty profound. On the block: $1.5 billion from high speed rail, $5.8 million from various transport research projects, and $280 million from the New Starts program for metropolitan transit (which funds projects like light rail, bus rapid transit, and commuter rail).