This column reflects the opinion of the writer. Learn about the differences between a news story and an opinion column.
I-1183 reflects reality
I received a “No on 1-1183” flier yesterday, and I must admit I’m a wee bit confused regarding the arguments against 1-1183.
As I understand it alcohol is already sold in convenience stores, gas stations and mini-marts in the form of beer and wine. I suspect the volume of sales of beer and wine far exceeds that for liquor. Liquor is far more expensive, and I suspect the younger generations prefer the taste of beer and wine.
The “new 27 percent tax” is only on those who will consume liquor, not on all consumers. The $100 million savings will benefit both consumers and non-consumers. Although I do not have the data to prove it, I would venture to make an educated guess that the majority of alcohol driving-related incidents occur with the consumers of wine and beer.
I personally believe it is time to face reality and vote yes on 1-1183.
Carl Smith
Spokane