Cartoons are propaganda

I really enjoy good editorial cartoons. They provide unique perspectives and insights into our political life, while bringing a smile to our faces. They can provide a real service by exposing and eviscerating the hypocrisy and half-truths that have been politicians’ stock in trade for time immemorial.

The subtle use of satire and irony to instantaneously make a point can be startling in its clarity and impact. However, the difference between satire and propaganda can sometimes be difficult to distinguish. In the case of Michael Ramirez’s work it is not hard to judge. It is almost always pure propaganda.

For example, his June 30 cartoon, in which he has the president saying, “I am a big fat liar,” is simply coarse and humorless. Contrast it with Nick Anderson’s subtle use of facial expressions and body language to make a cute and comical point without having to put badges on people to explain what he is trying to say.

Before featuring Ramirez’s work so often and prominently in your paper, I urge you to ask yourself this simple question: “Is this satire or propaganda?” I think you will usually find yourself affirming the latter. If so, please don’t publish the piece.

Jim Lee

Spokane