Moral, religious grounds

Conscientious objectors are excused from serving in the military in any capacity, even in time of war. A conscientious objector is defined as “a person who refuses to serve in the armed forces or to bear arms on moral or religious grounds.” (Merriam-Webster’s Desk Dictionary, 1995.)

Why should a person who refuses to officiate or provide a service at a wedding ceremony of a same-sex couple on moral or religious grounds be subject to prosecution and possible jail time? There are many other people who will gladly officiate and provide services for such an event, just as there are many people who will (and have) served in the military to defend our country.

Which is more important, defending our country or participating at a gay wedding? Which service provides the greatest benefit to our fellow man? Think about it.

Terry Hannon

Coeur d’Alene