Top Comment Today — Photoguy

Photoguy (RE: C-SPAN calling ): Otter certainly did not win. Pro-Life won if the contest was funniest candidate (and not being funny on purpose). Bujak did very well against Otter, certainly came out swinging from the start and kept it up all debate. Balukoff focused very heavy on education, not too much else. If I had to declare a winner, I would say it was a tie between Balukoff and Bujak. Both did well, held their own. Otter was on the defense for much of the debate. His message of “Ignore the numbers, in Idaho everyone is happy so that is all that matters” got old very fast.

Question: Who gained the most in this debate? Who lost the most?