Arrow-right Camera

Color Scheme

Subscribe now

This column reflects the opinion of the writer. Learn about the differences between a news story and an opinion column.

Will lead Avista for less

In reading the fine March 22 article on Avista and utility rate increases, I read that Avista considers its executive pay to be mostly paid by shareholders and company profits; i.e., not paid by customer rates.

Is there some Avista bond covenant or company bylaw that makes it illegal to use company profits for expenses other than executive pay? Surely not. If I am wrong, please correct me, but to say that customers aren’t paying for executive pay, or at least most of it, because company profits are paying for it strikes me as disingenuous at best, obfuscation at worst.

Company profits could keep rates lower if Avista so chose, I believe, and my guess is that Avista could find someone of reasonable intelligence with knowledge of the utility field for the pittance of $1 million per year. Why, I might even be willing to go back to school and learn how to help Avista through these difficult times for $1 million a year. Count me in at $5.5 million.

Bob Tattershall

Pullman

Letters Policy

The Spokesman-Review invites original letters on local topics of public interest. Your letter must adhere to the following rules:

  • No more than 250 words
  • We reserve the right to reject letters that are not factually correct, racist or are written with malice.
  • We cannot accept more than one letter a month from the same writer.
  • With each letter, include your daytime phone number and street address.
  • The Spokesman-Review retains the nonexclusive right to archive and re-publish any material submitted for publication.

Unfortunately, we don’t have space to publish all letters received, nor are we able to acknowledge their receipt. (Learn more.)

Submit letters using any of the following:

Our online form
Submit your letter here
Mail
Letters to the Editor
The Spokesman-Review
999 W. Riverside Ave.
Spokane, WA 99201
Fax
(509) 459-5098

Read more about how we crafted our Letters to the Editor policy