Arrow-right Camera

Color Scheme

Subscribe now

This column reflects the opinion of the writer. Learn about the differences between a news story and an opinion column.

March for Science

The April 21 Spokesman article on Dow Chemical’s attempt to get the Trump administration to “set aside” the results of government studies on pesticide safety provides a perfect illustration of the importance of objective, peer-reviewed science in public policy decisions.

Proclamations regarding internal corporate studies are not inherently inaccurate, but they often are. The contortion and distortion of reality to fit a template preferred by people like the Koch Brothers is far too common. This, coupled with donations to the political campaigns of those with minimal scientific literacy and an insatiable need for money to get elected, is part of a process reflecting the biggest problem with our government: excessive control by corporate lobbyists.

This is one of the main reasons I felt it necessary to participate in the March for Science in Spokane on April 22.

Ron Doyen, Ph.D.

Spokane

Letters Policy

The Spokesman-Review invites original letters on local topics of public interest. Your letter must adhere to the following rules:

  • No more than 250 words
  • We reserve the right to reject letters that are not factually correct, racist or are written with malice.
  • We cannot accept more than one letter a month from the same writer.
  • With each letter, include your daytime phone number and street address.
  • The Spokesman-Review retains the nonexclusive right to archive and re-publish any material submitted for publication.

Unfortunately, we don’t have space to publish all letters received, nor are we able to acknowledge their receipt. (Learn more.)

Submit letters using any of the following:

Our online form
Submit your letter here
Mail
Letters to the Editor
The Spokesman-Review
999 W. Riverside Ave.
Spokane, WA 99201
Fax
(509) 459-3815

Read more about how we crafted our Letters to the Editor policy