Arrow-right Camera
Subscribe now

The loss of dam removal

Get rid of them. The loss of ultra clean renewable electricity; billions of dollars for demolition; hundreds of millions and 30 years for removal of silt, mud and debris built up in the dam’s forebays; no more barge traffic to transport grains, produce, supplies and fuel; no more irrigation for potatoes, beets, tree farms, grapes, etc.; much-reduced boating, camping and recreational activities and few boat ramps; no cross-river traffic over the dams; loss of most marinas; vineyards would return to weeds and sagebrush; loss of barges would put hundreds of semi-trucks on the roads, daily plus extra shipping cost; loss of employees on farms/ranches; loss of payroll of dam employees, suppliers and support people; loss of their monies for stores, shops and communities; no more flood control.

Remember (you probably don’t) the flooding of Portland? Twice.

Dave Darlow

Spokane



Letters policy

The Spokesman-Review invites original letters on local topics of public interest. Your letter must adhere to the following rules:

  • No more than 250 words
  • We reserve the right to reject letters that are not factually correct, racist or are written with malice.
  • We cannot accept more than one letter a month from the same writer.
  • With each letter, include your daytime phone number and street address.
  • The Spokesman-Review retains the nonexclusive right to archive and re-publish any material submitted for publication.

Unfortunately, we don’t have space to publish all letters received, nor are we able to acknowledge their receipt. (Learn more.)

Submit letters using any of the following:

Our online form
Submit your letter here
Mail
Letters to the Editor
The Spokesman-Review
999 W. Riverside Ave.
Spokane, WA 99201
Fax
(509) 459-3815

Read more about how we crafted our Letters to the Editor policy