Arrow-right Camera
Go to e-Edition Sign up for newsletters Customer service
Subscribe now
Opinion >  Letters

A carbon tax for WA

While opponents argue against Inslee’s carbon tax, if we truly consider the externalities of carbon emissions, the real question is “How can we not afford it?”

Yes, as proposed the tax is expected to raise consumer prices 6-9 percent at the pump, 4-5 percent for electricity, and 9-11 percent for natural gas. Yet, these increases are modest in comparison to the social costs emissions impose across all sectors. Consider a “sampling” of water supply impacts alone. UW’s Climate Impacts Group projects increased frequency of water shortage years, inadequate summer electricity and substantial declines in salmon and trout population. And a word of warning to Spokane-area skiers: warm, low snow pack winters are expected to occur much more often.

Critics sarcastically claim that a carbon tax is a “great idea for job creation and attracting new business.” In truth, yes, it is great for job creation and attracting new businesses. To start, see assessments from the Brookings Institute which indicate carbon tax revenue will “simulate investment” and “spark job creation.”

Donald Trump has eliminated the possibility of a globally-uniform carbon tax, leaving it up to the states. Our Canadian neighbors could use some help. Washington should lead the way.

Calli VanderWilde



Letters policy

The Spokesman-Review invites original letters of no more than 200 words on topics of public interest. Unfortunately, we don’t have space to publish all letters received, nor are we able to acknowledge their receipt. We accept no more than one letter a month from the same writer. Please remember to include your daytime phone number and street address. The Spokesman-Review retains the nonexclusive right to archive and re-publish any material submitted for publication.

Send letters to:
Letters to the Editor
The Spokesman-Review
999 W. Riverside Ave.
Spokane, WA 99201

Fax: (509) 459-3815
Questions?: (509) 459-5430