Arrow-right Camera

Color Scheme

Subscribe now

This column reflects the opinion of the writer. Learn about the differences between a news story and an opinion column.

Columbia River hearings

The co-lead agencies doing this EIS did a very thorough job, looking at all the objectives and measures. There are five alternatives, including the status quo. My objection isn’t about the work that went into this process. It is quite extensive and involved.

I do object, however, that they aren’t holding public hearings after the coronavirus pandemic is over. Instead, they are currently inviting phone-in comments. This is a very important issue for the entire Columbia River System that affects not only Washington, but Idaho, Montana and Oregon.

Alternative MO3 (breaching the lower four Snake River dams) clearly shows that it is best for salmon, Native American cultures, and orcas. However, it is not the preferred alternative, which places inexpensive electricity above all the other objectives.

We need public hearings on these issues. People aren’t paying attention and are understandably distracted by the coronavirus now.

Carol Colpitts

Deer Park

Letters Policy

The Spokesman-Review invites original letters on local topics of public interest. Your letter must adhere to the following rules:

  • No more than 250 words
  • We reserve the right to reject letters that are not factually correct, racist or are written with malice.
  • We cannot accept more than one letter a month from the same writer.
  • With each letter, include your daytime phone number and street address.
  • The Spokesman-Review retains the nonexclusive right to archive and re-publish any material submitted for publication.

Unfortunately, we don’t have space to publish all letters received, nor are we able to acknowledge their receipt. (Learn more.)

Submit letters using any of the following:

Our online form
Submit your letter here
Mail
Letters to the Editor
The Spokesman-Review
999 W. Riverside Ave.
Spokane, WA 99201
Fax
(509) 459-5098

Read more about how we crafted our Letters to the Editor policy