Arrow-right Camera
Go to e-Edition Sign up for newsletters Customer service
Subscribe now
Opinion >  Letters

Journalistic standards?

I am writing with concern about Dave Nichol’s placement of this paragraph in the article Feds Remove Gray Wolf from Endangered Species List in Friday’s paper:

“In 2019, peer reviews commissioned by the Fish and Wildlife Service found that the agency’s proposal contained substantial errors and misrepresented current science on wolf conservation. The five reviewers unanimously criticized the delisting proposal, and four offered strong opposition.” [emphasis added]

Very early in the article your reporter wrote about Interior Secretary David Bernhardt, Rep. Newhouse, and Ashley House of the WA Cattlemen’s Association all quoting science as the basis for the delisting: “best scientific…data available”, “sound science”, “confidence in the science.”

Many readers would stop right there, wrongfully assuming these statements correctly represented the story that “science” told.

The critically important information that peer reviews — the gold standard of science — commissioned by the Fish and Wildlife Service itself, found substantial errors and misrepresentations, and that reviewers unanimously criticized delisting was buried in the middle of your article.

In The Elements of Journalism, Bill Kovach and Tom Rosenstiel talk about essential principles and practices of journalism, including its “first obligation is to the truth” and “its essence is a discipline of verification.”

Surely the fact that these 3 officials were completely mistaken in their statements qualified as important information that should have been included right after quoting them, if not before, to set the context for these inaccuracies.

In the future, please provide better context for false statements such as these.

Susan Virnig



Letters policy

The Spokesman-Review invites original letters on topics of public interest. Your letter must adhere to the following rules:

  • No more than 250 words
  • We reserve the right to reject letters that are not factually correct, racist or are written with malice.
  • We cannot accept more than one letter a month from the same writer.
  • With each letter, include your daytime phone number and street address.
  • The Spokesman-Review retains the nonexclusive right to archive and re-publish any material submitted for publication.
Unfortunately, we don’t have space to publish all letters received, nor are we able to acknowledge their receipt.
Click here to learn more.

Submit letters using any of the following:

Our online form

Mail: Letters to the Editor
The Spokesman-Review
999 W. Riverside Ave.
Spokane, WA 99201

Fax: (509) 459-3815
Questions?: (509) 459-5430