Arrow-right Camera
Subscribe now

My body, whose choice?

It seems life could soon imitate art in America. It depends on the decision of the SCOTUS, six of whom are Catholic. That lens informs their bias, as does their extraordinary power privilege. Catholic Chief Justice Roberts stated that fetal viability “doesn’t have anything to do with choice.” How true that is! Choice — a legal, moral and ethical prerogative to exercise one’s own autonomy through self-determination — is the very essence of being human.

Women, as humans, must not have liberty of self-determination taken from them. When Catholic Justice Barrett wonders what’s so onerous about a woman being forced to “an infringement on bodily autonomy,” she dismissively equates forced pregnancy with mandatory vaccines. Barrett doesn’t think that “pregnancy and parenthood are all part of the same burden.” Interesting that Barrett said “burden” rather than blessing! After all, Barrett is a highly privileged woman of the dominant caste who has ample resources to lighten her burden.

The burdens of an unwanted pregnancy are multifold. Maternal health outcomes in Mississippi and other states which have systematically restricted women’s options are dismal. The burdens of unsupported childbearing and rearing are confirmed in infant and maternal mortality and poverty rates. These states usually vote against expanded health care, family leave policies, child care, early pre-K education and other supportive mechanisms for families struggling to raise children.

A woman, equally imbued with rights as a man, knows best what her personal economy can bear: financial, physical, mental, social and family – all enormously more burdensome than, say, the imposition of a vaccine. Abortion isn’t mandatory! The hypocrisy of comparing pregnancy and resultant years of child-rearing to a public health vaccine mandate during a global pandemic is galling. My body, my choice … really?

Blessed be the fruit, indeed. Control of the womb perpetuates the strange fruits of patriarchy, misogyny and power over female autonomy.

Marilyn Darilek

Spokane



Letters policy

The Spokesman-Review invites original letters on local topics of public interest. Your letter must adhere to the following rules:

  • No more than 250 words
  • We reserve the right to reject letters that are not factually correct, racist or are written with malice.
  • We cannot accept more than one letter a month from the same writer.
  • With each letter, include your daytime phone number and street address.
  • The Spokesman-Review retains the nonexclusive right to archive and re-publish any material submitted for publication.

Unfortunately, we don’t have space to publish all letters received, nor are we able to acknowledge their receipt. (Learn more.)

Submit letters using any of the following:

Our online form
Submit your letter here
Mail
Letters to the Editor
The Spokesman-Review
999 W. Riverside Ave.
Spokane, WA 99201
Fax
(509) 459-3815

Read more about how we crafted our Letters to the Editor policy