Question: Do you think there is a creature commonly known as ‘Bigfoot’?
1. Yes, the plethora of sightings and physical evidence can’t be wrong
2. Yes, while I admit evidence is scant, I still think the creature exists
3. I think it existed at one time, but no longer
4. Only when some chubby clown can squeeze himself into the ‘Sasquatch suit’ or put on ‘Bigfeet’ to lay down phony tracks
5. I’d like to believe in Bigfoot, but the evidence just isn’t there
6. I think there’s likely unexplained creatures, but not Bigfoot as it’s commonly known
7. No, it is and always has been a hoax
8. No, and those who think Bigfoot is for real need to remove their tin-foil helmet
9. Other
DFO: No. 9 — Sasquatch blurks on HBO.
For the WorldNetDaily news report, click here.
D.F. Oliveria is a columnist and blogger for The Spokesman-Review. Huckleberries Online was judged the best 2008 Idaho newspaper blog by the Idaho Press Club. And the best 2007 news blog in the Pacific Northwest by the Society for Professional Journalist. Print Huckleberries is a past winner of the Herb Caen Memorial Column contest by the National Association of Newspaper Columnists. The Readership Institute of Northwestern University cited this blog as a good example of online community journalism.
999 W. Riverside, Spokane, WA 99201
P.O. Box 2160, Spokane, WA 99210
Main switchboard: (509) 459-5000 • (800) 338-8801
Newsroom: (509) 459-5400 • (800) 789-0029
Customer service: (800) 338-8801
© Copyright 2013, The Spokesman-Review
Terms of use • Privacy policy • Copyright policy
Spokane7
61°
Get blog updates by email
Find DFO on Facebook
DFO on Twitter
Please keep it civil. Don't post comments that are obscene, defamatory, threatening, off-topic, an infringement of copyright or an invasion of privacy. Read our forum standards and community guidelines.
You must be logged in to post comments. Please log in here or click the comment box below for options.
comments powered by Disqus« Back to Huckleberries Online