Arrow-right Camera

Wrong idea of decency

I am writing in response to Charles Krauthammer’s Aug. 14 column, “Mosque site offends decency.” I am afraid I cannot accept his conclusions.

Mr. Krauthammer writes that a Japanese cultural center at Pearl Harbor, for example, would be offensive, but, frankly, I wouldn’t find such a thing offensive at all. I don’t see how an appreciation of Japanese culture could be seen as insulting to those remembered at Pearl Harbor. To prevent the construction of such a building would be punishing the entire Japanese nation for the faults of a government that is long gone.

In the same way, to forbid the building of a mosque near ground zero would be blaming the Muslim religion for the sins of one radical offshoot. Muslims didn’t perpetrate 9/11. Radical Islamic terrorists did, and until we make that distinction, walls will be built in place of the bridges Mr. Krauthammer mentions.

A culture of misunderstanding, hate, separation and stereotyping is the real cause of the tragedy of 9/11. To continue that culture, to feed that same endless cycle of mistrust, that is what offends decency. That is the real sacrilege of ground zero.

Natalie Pilgeram



Top stories in Opinion

Editorial: Washington state lawmakers scramble to keep public in the dark

State lawmakers want to create a legislative loophole in Washington’s Public Records Act. While it’s nice to see Democrats and Republicans working together for once, it’s just too bad that their agreement is that the public is the enemy. As The Spokesman-Review’s Olympia reporter Jim Camden explained Feb. 22, lawmakers could vote on a bill today responding to a court order that the people of Washington are entitled to review legislative records.