Read for nutritional value

In response to Ryan Fraser’s letter (May 15) I agree with his frustration in the school’s book lists. He argues for modern novels added to the curriculum; however, the rest of his letter makes clear that he has limited understanding.

One problem is that students have not learned what constitutes a classic. A further problem remains outside the classroom.

While “classics are constantly in the works,” many publishers and writers no longer produce quality material, but instead work to grab a piece of the market. Most books offer an escape without leaving a lasting mark. We are inundated with books, but few that will reach beyond generations and social status to challenge the heart of each reader – one mark of a classic. At the same time, we reject the good nutrition of classics for the junk food of “Harry Potter.”

I challenge Mr. Fraser to become a discriminating reader. Look past the publishing date into the heart of the book. While becoming “Harry” brings momentary satisfaction, it will never stir your spirit like sitting in the bowels of the ship with Davy in Robert Louis Stevenson’s “Kidnapped.” Secondly, put that discriminating list before the school board and ask them to reconsider.

Tawnya Rux

Colbert