Arrow-right Camera

Color Scheme

Subscribe now

Not just for stoners

Dear Doug Clark:

I want to bring to your attention the fact that not all weed users who vote are just “stoners,” as you say. Some of these voters are critically ill patients. Have you had a close family member or friend who has, or had, cancer within the last 10 years? What about those people?

You need to pull your head out of the sand and see what it does for sick people. I feel you don’t look outside the box. Status quo! You have no clue what cancer patients feel like, and how eating or smoking weed helps you heal, helps you taste, makes you hungry, helps you sleep, slows down muscle spasms, and generally helps you cope with an illness.

Try looking at the big picture and thinking about the other side of weed. It is used by elderly people in chronic pain. Even cops get cancer. It has a lot of other uses than just a stoner’s use. It also brings in money into our state.

Do you even know why someone made it illegal? A rope maker felt threatened by hemp and made it illegal so he would get rich off his rope. God put it here for a reason, not just for stoners.

Rebecca Eliason

Spokane



Letters policy

The Spokesman-Review invites original letters on local topics of public interest. Your letter must adhere to the following rules:

  • No more than 250 words
  • We reserve the right to reject letters that are not factually correct, racist or are written with malice.
  • We cannot accept more than one letter a month from the same writer.
  • With each letter, include your daytime phone number and street address.
  • The Spokesman-Review retains the nonexclusive right to archive and re-publish any material submitted for publication.

Unfortunately, we don’t have space to publish all letters received, nor are we able to acknowledge their receipt. (Learn more.)

Submit letters using any of the following:

Our online form
Submit your letter here
Mail
Letters to the Editor
The Spokesman-Review
999 W. Riverside Ave.
Spokane, WA 99201
Fax
(509) 459-3815

Read more about how we crafted our Letters to the Editor policy