Arrow-right Camera
Subscribe now

MLK coverage disappointing

I was extremely disappointed with The Spokesman-Review’s Jan. 22 coverage of the Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Day march and rally in Olympia. Your focus on, and picture of, the young woman who took off her shirt was sensational, unprofessional, and it detracted from the serious intent and purpose of the 80 Spokanites who traveled to the Capitol to march, rally and speak with our legislators regarding the real needs of their constituents.

I am a retired master’s degreed social worker with 25 years of experience in health care. I carefully reinforced the very personal stories of the three young women (all university students) who explained to the staff of Sen. Mike Padden and Rep. Matthew Shea why they needed state assistance; so they could finish their education and become productive members of society. I was in the middle of the crowd of 300 from around the state rallying for economic and social justice on the Capitol steps, and I knew nothing of the antics of the pictured woman until I read your newspaper. Her actions were not our focus; they should not have been yours.

Pamela Arnold

Liberty Lake



Letters policy

The Spokesman-Review invites original letters on local topics of public interest. Your letter must adhere to the following rules:

  • No more than 250 words
  • We reserve the right to reject letters that are not factually correct, racist or are written with malice.
  • We cannot accept more than one letter a month from the same writer.
  • With each letter, include your daytime phone number and street address.
  • The Spokesman-Review retains the nonexclusive right to archive and re-publish any material submitted for publication.

Unfortunately, we don’t have space to publish all letters received, nor are we able to acknowledge their receipt. (Learn more.)

Submit letters using any of the following:

Our online form
Submit your letter here
Mail
Letters to the Editor
The Spokesman-Review
999 W. Riverside Ave.
Spokane, WA 99201
Fax
(509) 459-3815

Read more about how we crafted our Letters to the Editor policy