January 19, 2013 in Letters, Opinion

‘Arms’ not defined

 

According to Wikipedia, “The term assault weapon was originally used in the context of military weapons systems. The term assault weapon as used in context of civilian rifles has been attributed to gun-control activist Josh Sugarmann, author of the ‘Assault Weapons and Accessories in America.’ ”

It is a shame that the actions of a few, and I mean extremely few, legal gun owners are going to be the reason the rest may lose our constitutional right to bear certain or all arms. The Constitution does not define what different arms are allowed or not allowed, only the right to keep and bear arms.

We do not need more laws to control gun ownership, the laws on the books need to be enforced. The big thing to remember is that no gun makes a decision to fire and injure or kill, only the human pulling the trigger made that decision. Remember, an armed society is a polite society!

Tommy Christopher

Spokane

Get stories like this in a free daily email


Please keep it civil. Don't post comments that are obscene, defamatory, threatening, off-topic, an infringement of copyright or an invasion of privacy. Read our forum standards and community guidelines.

You must be logged in to post comments. Please log in here or click the comment box below for options.

comments powered by Disqus