Arrow-right Camera

Color Scheme

Subscribe now

Republican tax bill clever

The Republican tax bill is a clever piece of legislation. Faced with having to sell a plan that most Americans are totally against, Congress came up with an idea: Provide a small temporary give-back to most of the public while at the same time hide a bountiful permanent give-away to a few people who honestly do not need it.

According to one business analysis (by the Washington Post), those of us who earn less than $50,000 per year will pay, on average, a whopping $60-$380 in less taxes next year. Meanwhile, those earning $700,000 or more will see an average $50,000 tax break. But worse, while these reductions expire in time, buried within this “simplified” tax code are hundreds of provisions that allow those making more money than you could ever dream of to “permanently” pay less.

This unpopular bill is easily seen as an attempt to fool most of the public with a short-term, meager give back, while providing a true Christmas present to the wealthy. Only problem is it won’t work. People are not that easily fooled.

John R. Preczewski

Spokane



Letters policy

The Spokesman-Review invites original letters on local topics of public interest. Your letter must adhere to the following rules:

  • No more than 250 words
  • We reserve the right to reject letters that are not factually correct, racist or are written with malice.
  • We cannot accept more than one letter a month from the same writer.
  • With each letter, include your daytime phone number and street address.
  • The Spokesman-Review retains the nonexclusive right to archive and re-publish any material submitted for publication.

Unfortunately, we don’t have space to publish all letters received, nor are we able to acknowledge their receipt. (Learn more.)

Submit letters using any of the following:

Our online form
Submit your letter here
Mail
Letters to the Editor
The Spokesman-Review
999 W. Riverside Ave.
Spokane, WA 99201
Fax
(509) 459-3815

Read more about how we crafted our Letters to the Editor policy