Getting Up To Speed On Bike Performance
Q. I would like find out the difference in performance between the new Campagnolo Record Titanium 9-speed group and the new Shimano Dura Ace 9-speed road groups. I’ve read the bike magazines, but as usual, they’re ambiguous with praise for both.
Chris Cameron
Gear Guy: A tough question. The rationale for more speeds, of course, is to reduce the “gap” between gears and enable you to maintain a smooth pedaling cadence over any terrain changes. Particularly if you use a fairly wide cog (say, 13/26) that makes it much easier to find the right gear.
Certainly, the jumps from 6 speed to 7 speed, then from 7 speed to 8 speed, had real benefits for bicyclists. But we’re getting into an area of diminishing returns. Going from 8 to 9 speed, in my view, doesn’t add that much functionality.
What it does add is a boat load of complexity. So much so, in fact, that none of the 9-speed stuff from Shimano or Campy is backwards-compatible with 8 speed. You have to buy the while enchilada: shifter/levers, hubs, cassettes, rear derailleur the whole drive train. Ouch. I suspect that maintenance and parts replacement will also be more complicated and costly due to the narrower chains, narrower cogs and finer tolerances required with 9 speed.
On the upside, the Dura-Ace and Record groups make wide use of titanium for lighter weight. And they are said to work extremely well. I think racers and very serious recreational riders will benefit from 9 speed provided they already plan to buy a new bike or group. Otherwise I’m not sure the cost justifies it.
I put myself in that “serious recreational rider” group. Still, when I had to grapple with this question myself while recently outfitting a new road frame I decided to go with Campy Chorus 8-speed. The Chorus 9-speed group doesn’t cost much more, but I decided to stay with a system to which I’m accustomed. Perhaps in a year, when any bugs get worked out, I’ll take a look at 9 speeds.
Q. I’ve been thinking about camping out again (with a car) after an absence of some 25 years. I’m in my early 50s, a bit creaky from assorted disabilities and the accumulated effects of a sedentary life. I’m not as strong as I used to be, and my back has grown a little unpredictable.
I thought about getting a minivan and equipping it with a mattress, but esthetically that doesn’t match up to a softsided tent with the forest breeze soughing through the windows. What kind of two-three person tent would you recommend to fair-weather campers? And what about sleeping bags and mats? Any other suggestions?
This question is a lot tamer than your usual fare, but maybe you have some other closet readers like me. Whaddya say, gear guy?
Karl Thunemann
Gear Guy: Hey, I car-camp myself. I recall an evening last September at Oregon’s spectacular Cape Blanco State Park. Mrs. Gear and I had a big campfire going, a batch of fresh oysters percolating on a compact Weber grill, and a bottle of nicely chilled Chardonnay. I felt like the guy in “Field of Dreams” who looks around the baseball diamond and asks: “Is this heaven?” It sure seemed like it.
So make the most of what can be a decadent experience. I recommend highly an umbrella-style tent such as Eurekas Equinox 4 ($270) or the Quest Headland 4 (also $270). For a sleeping bag, a rectangular-style bag is roomier and more comfortable. Walruss semi-rectangular Dreamtime ($215) is a terrific bag; Slumberjacks Escape ($130) is a bit more affordable. Downy Airbeds ($30) are comfy full-size mattresses. Or, use a cot to get yourself off the ground. L.L. Bean’s folding cot ($85) is a high-quality alternative. And before turning in, be sure you have a Byer Maine Lounger ($35) for a comfortable camp chair.
Add a few camp lanterns, a crackling fire and a splash of rum in your hot chocolate. What could be better?
xxxx