School District Shirks Its Duty
Who’s the Coeur d’Alene School District trying to kid?
On Monday, school officials reluctantly released the terms of a $47,000 buyout agreement with former instructor Paul Mather.
Superintendent Doug Cresswell claimed the Coeur d’Alene School Board accepted the settlement to save money and to protect the five girls who had brought sexual assault charges against Mather. But a father of one of the young teenagers doesn’t accept that explanation. Nor do we.
“It doesn’t strike me as any real break for the girls,” the father said. “The tough part for them was to come forward in the first place. … I think the school board should have as much courage as the kids did to do the right thing.”
School trustees and officials, pressured by their insurance company, shirked their duty by passing this matter on to the state’s Professional Standards Commission for resolution. By that act of expedience, the district denied the alleged victims and the community a chance to put this scandal behind them and begin healing.
Mather, on the other hand, kept his teaching certificate and now has two decisions to bolster his claims of innocence: the school board’s capitulation and a 1st District Court jury acquittal on sex-abuse charges. The jury that found Mather innocent believed student claims that he’d touched their breasts and buttocks but felt the girls had made no attempt to stop him.
Mather has led a charmed life as a teacher - thanks to help from superiors and colleagues.
In 1989, he admitted having sex with a 16-year-old from a nearby town he’d met while attending an alcohol rehabilitation program. The school district allowed him to continue teaching after the girl and her parents decided not to press charges. Four years later, he was warned not to touch students after one complained about him.
The district’s wink-and-nod approach to Mather continued last spring when it decided to wait for a court trial rather than conduct a dismissal hearing after the latest allegations had surfaced. The burden of proof to dismiss a teacher is lower than the one a jury faces in convicting him.
If the finicky district had acted promptly and firmly, it would have served notice that it takes abuse complaints against teachers seriously - and possibly saved a year’s worth of salary.
Instead, the Coeur d’Alene School District has shown it considers the rights of adults more important than those of students.
, DataTimes The following fields overflowed: CREDIT = D.F. Oliveria/For the editorial board