Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper
Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883

Iraq Bars 2 American Investigators Action Comes Just Hours After Security Council Warned Of ‘Serious Consequences’

Craig Turner And Stanley Meisler Los Angeles Times

Making good on the previous day’s threat, Iraq on Thursday barred two Americans from returning to their jobs in Baghdad with a U.N. commission investigating Iraq’s chemical, biological and nuclear weapons programs.

The Americans were coming back from a brief holiday in the Persian Gulf state of Bahrain, U.N. officials said, when they were intercepted at Habbaniyah airfield about 60 miles west of Baghdad. A third American, working for the International Atomic Energy Agency, was approved for entry by the Iraqis, but under instructions from his supervisors returned to Bahrain with the others.

Two other Americans left Baghdad on Thursday on previously scheduled departures as their U.N. tours of duty ended. That left eight Americans on the 100-member U.N. inspection team in Iraq.

The events in the Persian Gulf unfolded less than nine hours after the U.N. Security Council warned of “serious consequences” unless Iraq pulls back from a Wednesday declaration that it no longer will accept American participation on the U.N. commission. Iraq gave Americans working for the commission in Iraq one week to leave.

Throughout Thursday, Western and Iraqi officials publicly exchanged increasingly heated rhetoric while Russia, France and Egypt privately spearheaded a vigorous diplomatic effort to persuade Iraq to back down.

The three Security Council members recently have expressed some sympathy for Iraq’s complaints about continuing U.N. economic sanctions, which date from its 1990 invasion of Kuwait. French and Russian companies also have negotiated multimillion-dollar contracts with the Iraqi oil industry that would go into effect once the sanctions are lifted.

But diplomats from those countries were described Thursday as chagrined and embarrassed that Iraq responded to their sympathy by targeting the Americans on the U.N. weapons team. Iraq’s action is considered a breach of the agreement ending the 1991 Persian Gulf War, in which a U.S.-led alliance drove the Iraqis out of Kuwait.

If Iraq refuses to withdraw its ultimatum, the Security Council could gradually increase the pressure on Baghdad, a U.N. official suggested Thursday. It could impose travel restrictions on top military officials, as it threatened to do last week. It also could extend the travel ban to other Iraqis, crack down on smuggling that breaks the U.N.-imposed embargo and increase the size of the “no-fly” zones over northern and southern Iraq from which Iraqi aircraft are banned.

Officials in Washington, London and Paris also indicated that military retaliation remains under consideration. “This is a very serious matter, and we are not ruling out any option at this time,” said State Department spokesman James P. Rubin.

But Iraq remained defiant.

“We have not chosen confrontation…. We are defending our rights,” Saad Kasim Hamoodi, head of the Arab and International Committee in the Iraqi National Assembly, said in Baghdad. “We are on the defense, but if they (the Americans) pushed the issue toward a military confrontation, we would not be scared of this option and we will not back down from the stand we took.”

Nizar Hamdoun, Iraq’s ambassador to the United Nations, said Baghdad was “forced into this decision” by the continuing economic embargo, which Iraq blames solely on the United States.

While the United Nations said it had received Iraqi assurances that there is no threat to the safety of the eight Americans remaining in the capital, it has declined to release any identification of them or any information about the nature of their work with the commission.

The Iraqis have said they will cooperate with all non-American inspectors.