Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper
Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883

Think Twice Before Putting All Lobbyists In Same Group

Doug Floyd Interactive Editor

Critics don’t need a lot of prompting to take off on lobbyists, but state Sen. Jim West’s recent telephone threat to kill one regardless of whether he meant it literally triggered (sorry) more condemnation of lobbyists than of West.

It makes you wonder if that loathing is aimed at the likes of David and Martha Jones, Spokane residents who lobbied the Legislature for a law aimed at curtailing accidents like the one that killed their 13-year-old bicyclist son Cooper.

Or the family of Stanley Stevenson, a retired Seattle firefighter who was stabbed to death by a man who since has been found innocent by reason of insanity. Stevenson’s survivors lobbied the Legislature to enact a law giving judges more latitude to confine and treat mentally ill offenders who commit misdemeanors.

Or Project 395, a citizen lobbying group that has been working for years to get state and federal officials to make needed safety improvements to U.S. Highway 395 north of Spokane. They’re reporting some encouragement that Congress may provide the funds.

So are lobbyists really such detestable creatures as a class or are they, at times at least, concerned citizens willing to give their own time and energy to make life better for their communities?

Life-or-death decisions

Next time you read or hear one of those stories about a law-enforcement officer who shoots a suspect who turns out to be unarmed, think about Omak (Wash.) Police Officer Don Eddy Jr.’s account of last month’s tragic incident in Omak.

Eddy was wounded and his partner, Mike Marshall, killed when they confronted Juan Duarte Gonzalez at an Omak motel.

The two guns Gonzalez drew were small. Small enough, it looked to Eddy and Marshall, that they might be toys. The officers hesitated to respond to the threat with deadly force until it was too late.

Does that experience alter how those other situations should be judged?

No role for the ACLU

How best to resolve which reading material is suitable for students? Leave it to a review panel composed of parents and teachers, says James A. Nelson, Spokane, but “without any input from the ACLU and other individuals demanding adult rights for school children.”