Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper
Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883

Census 2000 Plan Rights Old Wrongs

Census 2000 workers who try to accurately count the number of Native Americans will be knocking on doors toting more than their briefcases. They will be carrying the history of the relationship between non-Indian government types and the Indians. That history does not include much trust.

In 1860, Indians were finally counted as a separate population.

And it wasn’t until 1960 that people could identify themselves as Indians to census workers. Up until that time, census workers made the call. Who knows how many Native people remained uncounted because of that subjectivity?

In 1990, 12.2 percent of Indians living on reservations were missed altogether by the Census Bureau. Tribes lost out on federal funds and also lost some of the pride that comes with knowing a tribe is growing and thriving. Accurate numbers also help tribes gain political and lobbying power.

As Census 2000 approaches, smart steps are being taken to help change this history. The Census Bureau is holding several meetings throughout the country to brainstorm solutions to the undercounting problem. And to also figure out the best ways to garner cooperation on the reservations when census workers come calling.

Indian census workers are acting as liaisons with the tribes, urging cooperation as the countdown begins. Lynn Palmanteer-Holder, a Colville Tribe member, has been in contact, in person, with tribes throughout Washington, Oregon and Idaho. The travel’s been grueling but with some good payoffs. The people she meets trust her; many know her family and, most importantly, they listen to her about the importance of participating in the census.

Another smart decision: Census takers will go door-to-door on most reservations to get the forms filled out in a personal interview. This one-on-one contact should guarantee more cooperation. And the goal of hiring tribe members to do the counts should also help eliminate the 1990 undercount problem. The Kalispels and Colvilles estimate the undercount 10 years ago might have been as high as 50 percent!

Continued dialogue, cooperation and being mindful of past mistakes will be required for the Census 2000 plan to work. This new way of counting Indian populations will take more time, energy and money. But the federal government, and the tribes, can’t afford not to make it work much better in 2000.