Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper

The Spokesman-Review Newspaper The Spokesman-Review

Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883
Clear Day 24° Clear
News >  Nation/World

Pentagon mulling troop cuts

Tom Bowman Baltimore Sun

WASHINGTON – Pentagon officials are considering cutting as many as 34,000 soldiers – the bulk of them from the National Guard – at a time when U.S. ground forces are stretched in Iraq, according to defense officials.

The proposed cuts are part of a reduction in the growth of defense spending over the next five years ordered by the White House. The manpower cuts stem from a decision by Army leaders to sacrifice troop strength in order to provide more money for new weapons systems and other equipment, said defense officials, who requested anonymity.

The plan, which has not yet been approved by Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, is likely to spur criticism from members of Congress, who have pressed for a larger Army, and prompt even greater opposition from the nation’s governors, who command the part-time Guard soldiers unless they are called to federal duty. State officials rely heavily on the 334,000-soldier Army Guard for natural disasters, such as Hurricane Katrina.

The plan calls for the reduction of some 26,000 Army Guard soldiers. It would eliminate as many as six brigades – each with about 3,500 soldiers – as well as two division headquarters, officials said. One aviation brigade would likely be targeted, along with five ground brigades, including as many as four armored and mechanized units, officials said. No specific states have been singled out for cuts, but those types of ground units are in Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Washington, Tennessee, Mississippi, Louisiana, Minnesota and Idaho.

The rest of the proposed cuts would come from the 189,000-soldier Army Reserve, which would lose 4,000 soldiers, and the 492,000-soldier active-duty Army, which would be cut by one brigade, officials said.

Asked about the plan, Paul Boyce, an Army spokesman, said: “The U.S. Army is looking at a great number of options. Nothing has been decided at this time.”

Lt. Gen. Steven Blum, chief of the National Guard Bureau, said Army officials have not told him about any decisions on troop reductions.

“Nobody’s talked to me about having significant cuts in the National Guard,” Blum said. Still, he said, eliminating six Guard brigades would amount to a “significant loss” of capability for the Guard, both for its domestic responsibilities and in its support for overseas missions, such as Iraq.

One Pentagon official, who requested anonymity, said the decision to reduce troop levels was spurred by the need to cut $32 billion in Pentagon spending between 2007 and 2011. The Army’s share of that cut over five years is $11.6 billion or 36 percent, said the official, though the Army’s share of the total Pentagon budget is about 24 percent.

“The Defense Department does not have enough money to pay for all the bills it has to pay,” the official said. “The Army leadership knows it’s a tough call.”

The official said much of the Army’s budget – 40 cents of each dollar – goes for personnel costs, compared with 16 cents of each dollar for hardware – everything from radios and night-vision goggles to Humvees and tanks. In the 1990s, the Army reduced the amount of money it devoted to such hardware and now finds itself with equipment shortages, which have been exacerbated by war losses and damage from ongoing missions in Iraq and Afghanistan.

At the same time, the Army hopes to field the Future Combat System in the next decade, a complex network of armored vehicles, unmanned drones, sensors and weapons systems. Last month, the Pentagon said the system will cost $161 billion, a 64 percent increase from last year’s estimate.

The Spokesman-Review Newspaper

Local journalism is essential.

Give directly to The Spokesman-Review's Northwest Passages community forums series -- which helps to offset the costs of several reporter and editor positions at the newspaper -- by using the easy options below. Gifts processed in this system are not tax deductible, but are predominately used to help meet the local financial requirements needed to receive national matching-grant funds.

Active Person

Subscribe now to get breaking news alerts in your email inbox

Get breaking news delivered to your inbox as it happens.