Favoritism threatens Baghdad security plan
BAGHDAD, Iraq – The Baghdad security plan, which some cast as the last chance to avert a civil war, will be thwarted by Iraq’s prime minister because he is unwilling to tackle the country’s biggest security threat, many residents and politicians fear.
The plan calls for U.S. forces to sweep neighborhoods and help restore services, eventually leaving the capital under Iraqi military and police control. If that happens, U.S. troops could begin to withdraw. If it doesn’t, the country’s sectarian conflict could spiral out of control and escalate into a regional war between Iraq’s Shiite and Sunni Muslim neighbors.
The offensive hasn’t produced any major improvements in the capital since it began on June 14, and many Iraqis fear the plan is doomed by Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki’s willingness to attack Sunni insurgents but not the Shiite militias that support his Dawa political party.
“The government has to make a clear decision about dismantling militias,” said Saad al-Janabi, a member of the secular Iraqi slate. “Reconciliation will not happen unless the Iraqi army is in charge.”
Maliki blasted U.S. soldiers for raiding a suspected Shiite militia leader’s home early last week in the Baghdad slum of Sadr City. It was the most vitriolic language Maliki has used to describe U.S. military tactics to stop the surge of sectarian violence in the capital.
The U.S. raid targeted the Mahdi army, which many say is the crux of Baghdad’s security problems. Composed of thousands of Shiite men and led by firebrand cleric Moqtada al-Sadr, the group has seized control of parts of the capital, killing numbers of Sunnis and evicting others from their homes.
Sadr City residents said that three civilians were killed during the raid; U.S. officials said one was injured and three suspects were detained.
“The American operation used excessive force when they used airplanes which were too much to arrest suspected insurgents,” Maliki said in the interview. “I immediately contacted the U.S. forces to stop the attacks as they didn’t have my permission to carry out this operation.”
His comments immediately drew broad ire.
Maliki, once a harsh critic of Sunnis, adopted a more centrist stance after he became prime minister in April, a development the Bush administration hailed as a milestone for Iraqi democracy. But his Dawa Party won the prime minister’s slot only with al-Sadr’s backing.
“Why did he feel so angry about the attack on Sadr City, but say nothing about the many other attacks against Sunni cities?” asked Sheik Khalif al-Elaiyan, a Sunni member of parliament. “Sadrists have committed many crimes against the Sunni people.”
Others said he was putting his political survival ahead of the nation’s interests, and his tactic could backfire.
“He must change. This is not his private office. He should represent all Iraqis,” said Mithal al-Alusi, a secular Shiite member of parliament. The Baghdad security plan “is the last chance for Maliki.”