Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper
Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883

Payday industry tries to soften image


Mitchell McFadden and his wife Rena lost their home and are living in a bi-weekly rental hotel. 
 (Associated Press / The Spokesman-Review)
Associated Press The Spokesman-Review

COLUMBIA, S.C. – Soft music plays in the background of a new TV ad urging viewers only to use payday loans for emergencies. One scene shows a broken-down car. Another depicts a young boy in a doctor’s office, his arm in a sling.

“Please borrow only what you feel comfortable paying back when it’s due,” says Darrin Andersen, president of the Community Financial Services Association. A new emblem will tell borrowers which lenders meet his trade group’s requirements, Andersen says in the ad.

The $10 million campaign, announced last month along with some industry policy changes, came as states from Virginia to New Mexico consider legislation to limit payday lending practices. But it’s not stopping consumer watchdogs and people already in debt from questioning the motives of an industry whose loans’ annual interest rates can exceed 400 percent.

“Payday lenders make it easy for consumers to get trapped in predatory debt,” said Teresa Arnold, legislative director for AARP in South Carolina.

Payday lenders offer quick cash advances – for a fee – secured by a postdated personal check from the borrower. Customers are supposed to repay the loan once they receive their next paycheck. Borrowers who can’t pay often roll over the loan repeatedly, leading to more charges that can quickly add up and lead to a cycle of debt. Customers are drawn to the lenders because, unlike banks and credit unions, they don’t run credit checks.

Rena McFadden and her husband are two people who’ve become trapped. Her husband has been dealing with lenders threatening court action unless the McFaddens quickly repay the $2,400 they owe.

There are more than 22,000 payday advance locations in the United States that garner $6 billion annually in revenues, according to Steven Schlein, a spokesman for the financial services association, which represents about two-thirds of payday lending companies.

The payday loan industry’s biggest change would give customers more time to pay back a loan with no financial penalty. This extended payment plan would be available at least once a year and provide borrowers between two and four extra months to pay off loans. It was paired with the ad campaign and a ban on ads that promote payday advances for “frivolous purposes” like vacations.

But lawmakers still are pushing changes. In South Carolina, home to Advance America, the nation’s largest payday lender, lawmakers are considering a measure that would cap at 36 percent the annual interest fee on the loans and limit the number of payday loans a consumer could have with a single payday loan company.

Eleven states already have similar interest-rate limits on payday lenders, according to consumer watchdogs, and the payday lending industry considers such rates too low to remain profitable. New proposals in 10 other states would impose similar limits, said Carol Hammerstein, a spokeswoman for the Durham, N.C.-based Center for Responsible Lending.

Hammerstein said the push for new interest rate limits comes in the wake of caps imposed last fall by Congress. Legislators put a 36 percent annual cap on loans to military service members following disclosures that thousands of troops were in debt to payday lenders.

AARP in South Carolina is not content with the industry program announced last week. Arnold said the number of payday lenders in the state has more than doubled over the last five years. AARP’s 2005 survey of credit counselors found that one in four clients had payday loans – usually multiple loans – and that the loans were a major part of their credit problems.

“It’s not unusual (for counselors) to see clients paying $1600 for a $500 loan,” Arnold added.

At Fort Jackson near Columbia, Madelyn Mercado, head of the installation’s consumer advocacy and financial advising programs, said she knows soldiers who had been paying up to 900 percent interest on their loans.

“We’ve seen some pretty ugly cases,” Mercado said.

Lately, she’s seen a drop in the number of soldiers seeking help because of payday loan problems. Though Mercado said she can’t be certain of the reason, she thinks the drop is due to the interest limits passed by Congress and signed into law by President Bush in October.