Feds ask to put gray wolves back on endangered species list

BILLINGS – Federal wildlife officials asked a judge Monday to put gray wolves in the Northern Rockies back on the endangered species list – a sharp reversal from the government’s prior contention that the animals were thriving.

Attorneys for the Fish and Wildlife Service asked U.S. District Judge Donald Molloy in Missoula to vacate the agency’s February finding that more than 1,400 wolves in the region no longer needed federal protection.

The government’s request follows a July injunction in which Molloy had blocked plans for public wolf hunts this fall in Montana, Wyoming and Idaho.

“What we want to do is look at this more thoroughly,” Fish and Wildlife spokeswoman Sharon Rose said. “We definitely have a lot of wolves out there, but we need to address some of (Molloy’s) concerns in a way that people feel comfortable with.”

At issue is whether a decade-long wolf restoration program has reversed the near-extermination of wolves last century, or if – as environmentalists claim – their long-term survival remains in doubt because of proposed hunting.

The government’s request reconsider the issue was filed in response to an April lawsuit from a dozen environmental and animal rights groups.

“I would call that victory. What they’re requesting is to go back to the drawing boards,” said Doug Honnold, an Earthjustice attorney representing the plaintiffs. They include the Sierra Club, Defenders of Wildlife, the Humane Society of the United States and other local and national groups.

If Molloy goes along with the government’s request, the Fish and Wildlife Service would embark on a re-evaluation of wolves that could last months or years. The agency would again open the issue to public comment before returning with a new decision.

In the meantime, the killing of some wolves by government wildlife agents or ranchers would continue.

A recent inventory in the three states showed wolf population in decline this year for the first time in more than a decade. Federal biologists say the decline occurred because wolves had filled up the best habitat in the region.

Honnold questioned whether disease, illegal hunting or other factors might have contributed to the drop, which saw wolf numbers decline from 1,545 during the summer of 2007 to 1,455 this summer.

Under the federal rule that took the animal off the list in February, authority over the region’s wolf populations had passed to state agencies in Montana, Wyoming and Idaho.

In his July injunction, Molloy put that authority back in federal hands. The judge questioned whether wildlife laws within the three states – particularly Wyoming – would be enough to protect wolves from excessive or indiscriminate hunting.

Molloy also questioned whether packs had been intermingling enough to avoid inbreeding – a concern raised by recent research into wolf genetics.

In court papers filed Monday, federal attorneys said the proposal to strip endangered species protections needed to be reconsidered “in light of the Court’s opinion” in the injunction.

In Idaho, the office of Gov. Butch Otter said biologists there already have begun research that could bolster claims that the wolf population is thriving.

And in Wyoming, state Attorney General Bruce Salzburg said Monday his office is considering “various options” to answer the issues raised in Molloy’s injunction.

“One is amendments to the (Wyoming Game and Fish) Commission’s rules and regulations, and the other is amendments to Wyoming statutes.” Salzburg said. “Whether or not the Legislature wants to amend Wyoming statutes is up to the Legislature.”

Rose, the Fish and Wildlife Service spokeswoman, said her agency has not yet decided whether it will return with another proposal to take wolves off the endangered list or if more restoration work needs to be done.