Barack Obama appeared this week with health industry bigwigs, proclaiming light at the end of the health care tunnel.
Among those gathered were executives from HMO giants Kaiser Foundation Health Plan and Health Net Inc., and the health insurance lobbying group America’s Health Insurance Plans; from the American Hospital Association and the American Medical Association; from medical-device companies; and from the pharmaceutical industry, including the president and CEO of Merck and former Rep. Billy Tauzin, now president and CEO of PhRMA, the massive industry lobbying group. They have pledged to voluntarily shave some $2 trillion off of U.S. health care costs over 10 years. But these groups, which are heavily invested in the U.S. health care status quo, have little incentive to actually make good on their promises.
Still absent from the debate are advocates for a single-payer system. Single-payer health care is not “socialized medicine.” According to Physicians for a National Health Program, single-payer means “the government pays for care that is delivered in the private (mostly not-for-profit) sector.”
A February CBS News poll found that 59 percent in the U.S. say the government should provide national health insurance.
Single-payer advocates have been protesting in Senate Finance Committee hearings, chaired by Democratic Montana Sen. Max Baucus. Last week, at a committee hearing with 15 industry speakers, not one represented the single-payer perspective. A group of single-payer advocates, including doctors and lawyers, filled the hearing room.
Protester Adam Schneider yelled: “We need to have to have single-payer at the table. I have friends who have died, who don’t have health care, whose health care did not withstand their personal health emergencies. … Single-payer now!”
Baucus gaveled for order, guffawing, “We need more police.” The single-payer movement has taken his words as a rallying cry. At a hearing Tuesday, five more were arrested. They call themselves the “Baucus 13.”
One of the Baucus 13, Kevin Zeese, recently summarized Baucus’ career campaign contributions:
“…from: the insurance industry: $1,170,313; health professionals: $1,016,276; pharmaceuticals/health products industry: $734,605; hospitals/nursing homes: $541,891; health services/HMOs: $439,700.”
That’s almost $4 million from the very industries that have the most to gain or lose from health care reform.
As I traveled through Montana recently, from Missoula to Helena to Bozeman, health care activists kept referring to Baucus as the “money man.”
Wisconsin Sen. Russ Feingold, a single-payer advocate, said his position will not likely prevail in Washington: “I don’t think there’s any possibility that that will come out of this Congress.” That’s if things remain business as usual.
Mario Savio led the Free Speech Movement on the UC Berkeley campus. In 1964, he said: “There comes a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart, that you can’t take part, you can’t even passively take part, and you’ve got to put your bodies upon the gears and upon the wheels, upon all the apparatus, and you’ve got to make it stop. And you’ve got to indicate to the people who run it, the people who own it, that unless you’re free, the machine will be prevented from working at all.”
The current official debate has locked single-payer options out of the discussion, but also escalated the movement – from Healthcare-NOW! to Single Payer Action – to shut down the orderly functioning of the debate until single-payer gets a seat at the table.
Subscribe to the Coronavirus newsletter
Get the day’s latest Coronavirus news delivered to your inbox by subscribing to our newsletter.