The Spokesman’s first gay marriage announcement
Today, the S-R published it's first gay marriage announcment. (The couple was married in California.)
On his blog, editor Steve Smith discusses an example of feedback he received:
While I recognize their marriage was legalized in California, same sex marriage is not legal in the state of Washington. Thus, I feel the Spokesman Review has done a grave disservice to their readers/subscribers by placing a picture of something not legal in the celebratory section of the paper. It is one thing to place illegal behavior on the front page when reporting criminal activity. It is quite another to place it in a place of celebration. I highly doubt the Spokesman would place a picture of a minor drinking alcohol in this section. I find this picture similar in legality respects. As a long time subscriber I enjoy the TODAY section for it's celebratory nature, it's local flavor, and it's cultural involvement. This put a damper on that enjoyment.
QUESTION: What do you think? Should the S-R not publish gay marriage announcements?