The value of no-cut athletics (Sept. 21): There was a time long ago when I was critical of the middle school sports policy of no-cuts. Along with others, I thought it detrimental to the futures of "better" athletes who were supposed to be prepared for the eventuality of high school sports. But then my kids, with varying degrees of success, played. As I watched the system work – and concurrently went through the club sports thing – my philosophy changed. Universal participation, including basketball teams with 30 or 40 kids, isn't a bad thing; indeed it should be encouraged. The best will play varsity, the rest, divided into as many teams as necessary for junior varsity games, play for their own rewards. Some mature athletes who were varsity in junior high never improve or play in high school. Other kids who are physically less mature, blossom. Still others who would never play in high school profit from the experience and fellowship.