Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper
Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883

Part-Time Work A National Trend Corporations Benefiting From Cutting Benefits

Amy Ellerson Miami Herald

For five years, Delroy Lewin has worked part time for United Parcel Service in Lauderhill, Fla., and every year he asks for a full-time job.

Lewin, 33, is paid less than full-timers and doesn’t get the same benefits, even though he sometimes works 40 hours a week. A vacation is virtually out of the question, he says, and his health insurance and pension plan cannot support a growing family. His wife, Mauvlyn, is four months pregnant with their first child.

At issue in the labor dispute between the Teamsters union and UPS is the status of part-timers like Lewin. It’s a labor problem that goes beyond this strike. Nationwide, the ranks of part-time workers have expanded over the last decade, initially driven by worker demand for flexible hours, and more recently propelled by corporate cost-cutting and downsizing.

“It’s good that this issue is getting some attention,” said Chris Tilly, a labor economist at the University of Massachusetts at Lowell. “Companies should be thinking about the size of their part-time work force and the second-class status of part-time workers.”

Tilly, the author of “Half a Job,” a 1996 book on part-time work, said the UPS dispute is “really the tip of the iceberg.” He and other labor economists warn of a growing trend in corporate America toward “lousy jobs,” including part-time and temporary positions.

“The level of job security has gone down, and certainly real wages have gone down,” Tilly said. “On average, jobs are getting worse.”

Part-time employment in America became widespread in the 1950s and ‘60s, when young mothers and teens wanted to work, but not full time. By the mid-1970s, the increase in part-time work had less to do with demographics and more to do with corporate cost-cutting.

“We’re seeing a national trend toward taking good jobs with good benefits and making them insecure, whether it’s by downsizing, or out-sourcing, or hiring more part-time workers,” said Kate Bronfenbrenner, director of labor education research at Cornell University.

Only 19 percent of American part-time workers at medium and large companies receive medical insurance, compared with 77 percent of full-time employees, according to the Employee Benefits Research Institute in Washington. Only half of part-timers get paid vacations, compared with 96 percent of full-timers.

Yet the majority of part-time workers in America, primarily mothers, students and the elderly, are happy with their part-time status. Only 3.5 percent of the labor force is involuntarily part-time, down from 6.5 percent in 1991, when there was an economic recession.

“In hard times, people take what they can get,” said Ken McDonnell, a research analyst with the Employee Benefits Research Institute. “As the economy goes into a recession, the percentage of part-time workers increases.”

At UPS, many employees are frustrated with the lack of full-time opportunities. In 1996, the company hired 180,000 part-timers, and only 40,000 remain with the company today - a turnover rate of 150 percent.

“A lot of workers are leaving because they want full-time jobs and aren’t getting them,” said Bronfenbrenner, who recently conducted a Teamsters-funded survey of 134 former part-time employees.

MEMO: Cut in Spokane edition.

Cut in Spokane edition.